Feed the Children

Abstract To understand the household decision-making process regarding food expenditures for children in poor households in Nairobi, we conduct an experiment with 424 married and monogamous couples. In the experiment, the spouses (individually and jointly) allocate money between themselves and nutritious meals for one of their children. We propose a novel and simple test to distinguish between cooperative/collective and non-cooperative decision behaviour. We find strong empirical support for the collective model of household consumption. This collective model indicates that the spouses’ structural bargaining weights derived from observed consumption patterns strongly correlate with more traditional indicators of power. Furthermore, our results suggest that women do not have stronger preferences for children’s meals than men. Finally, we document a significant heterogeneity in both individual preferences and intra-household decision-making processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economic Journal
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaf099
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feed the Children

Laurens Cherchye, Bram De Rock, Frédéric Vermeulen, Charlotte Ringdal et al.
The Economic Journal
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
article

Feed the Children

Laurens Cherchye, Bram De Rock, Frédéric Vermeulen, Charlotte Ringdal, Pierre‐André Chiappori
article en

Abstract

Abstract To understand the household decision-making process regarding food expenditures for children in poor households in Nairobi, we conduct an experiment with 424 married and monogamous couples. In the experiment, the spouses (individually and jointly) allocate money between themselves and nutritious meals for one of their children. We propose a novel and simple test to distinguish between cooperative/collective and non-cooperative decision behaviour. We find strong empirical support for the collective model of household consumption. This collective model indicates that the spouses’ structural bargaining weights derived from observed consumption patterns strongly correlate with more traditional indicators of power. Furthermore, our results suggest that women do not have stronger preferences for children’s meals than men. Finally, we document a significant heterogeneity in both individual preferences and intra-household decision-making processes.

The Economic Journal
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Chr. Michelsen Institute (NO), Columbia University (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Feed the Children — Laurens Cherchye, Bram De Rock, et al. · The Economic Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS