Comparison of Elicit AI and Traditional Literature Searching in Evidence Syntheses Using Four Case Studies

Whilst Elicit searches are currently not sensitive enough to replace traditional searching, Elicit is continually improving, and further evaluations should be undertaken as new developments take place.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.70050
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Elicit AI and Traditional Literature Searching in Evidence Syntheses Using Four Case Studies

Su Golder, Oscar Lau
1 citations
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
Digital Imaging in Medicine
1.88
article

Comparison of Elicit AI and Traditional Literature Searching in Evidence Syntheses Using Four Case Studies

Su Golder, Oscar Lau
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Whilst Elicit searches are currently not sensitive enough to replace traditional searching, Elicit is continually improving, and further evaluations should be undertaken as new developments take place.

Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and MethodsVol. 3(6)
University of York (GB), Hull York Medical School (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Digital Imaging in Medicine
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Elicit AI and Traditional Literature Searching in Evidence Syntheses Using Four Case Studies — Su Golder, Oscar Lau · Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS