Should mustard still be considered as a significant food allergen?

Background – Available epidemiology data on mustard allergy have not been updated in the last 20 years, while such food remains considered as an important source of severe reaction and is required to be notified on food labels in the European Union. T

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175897468.84945814/v1
Primary Topic
Dye analysis and toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Should mustard still be considered as a significant food allergen?

Pascal Demoly, Davide Caimmi, Morgane ALBICE
Dye analysis and toxicity
article

Should mustard still be considered as a significant food allergen?

Pascal Demoly, Davide Caimmi, Morgane ALBICE
article en

Abstract

Background – Available epidemiology data on mustard allergy have not been updated in the last 20 years, while such food remains considered as an important source of severe reaction and is required to be notified on food labels in the European Union. T

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR), Austrian Society of Dermatology and Venereology (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Dye analysis and toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Should mustard still be considered as a significant food allergen? — Pascal Demoly, Davide Caimmi, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS