Priorities, concerns, and potential compromises amongst urban forest stakeholders: international lessons from Aotearoa New Zealand
Abstract Urban forests provide numerous benefits including habitat for wildlife, improving human health, purifying air and water, and preventing and mitigating the effects of climate change. The need to protect and improve our urban forests will only increase as populations increase and cities densify and expand over time. However, urban forest establishment and maintenance is challenging due to a lack of effective policies, delays, lack of communication, inappropriate targets, and lack of recognition, disunity, or resourcing amongst stakeholders. Here we present the results from a joint urban forest symposium-workshop that sought to determine the priorities and challenges of different stakeholder groups in New Zealand, including arborists, ecologists, non-ecologist researchers, indigenous peoples, and planners. We synthesise these lessons as recommendations to improve urban forest planning, design, establishment, and minimise conflicts between stakeholder groups. While the highest priorities of each stakeholder group are fairly distinct, there are high levels of overlap in the general priorities and challenges they face in working towards advancing those priorities. We suggest a 3-phase framework to deliver progress that broadly considers (1) data collection, (2) policy development, and (3) resource development. We suggest this framework should be supported by continual monitoring and data sharing, an increased investment in green employment and education, and further recognition of urban foresters, indigenous communities, and ecologists. We suggest that an inclusive approach based on a shared understanding of forest values and removing barriers is most likely to result in long-term success.
Authors
- Yvette L. Dickinson
- M. J. C. Walker
- Margaret C. Stanley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0701-8935)
- Rebecca Kiddle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0394-3234)
- Jonathon Avery
- David J. Stejskal
- Keith Elliot
- Sylvia Tapuke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6646-1278)
- David Spencer
- Robyn Simcock
- Mirjam Schindler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6279-4510)
- Tara Chapman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5994-4052)
- Tim Barnard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4063-6084)
- Daniel R. Richards (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8196-8421)
- D. G. Hayes
- William Melville
- Claire Freeman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4287-2435)
- Colin D. Meurk
- Brian Martin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7584-7722)
- Alison Slade (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7511-8359)
- Kelly Hertzog
- Justin Morgenroth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2747-7349)
- Zoë Avery
- Thomas F. Carlin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5322-2075)
- Tipene Merritt
- Christopher Walsh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6149-9560)
- Tamara Mutu
Institutions
- Treasury (NZ)
- TATI University College (MY)
- Statistics New Zealand (NZ)
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Scion (NZ)
- University of Canterbury (NZ)
- New Zealand Council for Educational Research (NZ)
- Auckland Council (NZ)
- Wellington City Council (NZ)
- Health Research Council of New Zealand (NZ)
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi (NZ)
- Future Forests Research (NZ)
- Christchurch City Council (NZ)
- Ipswich City Council (AU)
- Christchurch Clinical Studies Trust (NZ)
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research (NZ)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Urban Ecosystems
- Published
- 2025-09-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-025-01801-8
- Primary Topic
- Urban Green Space and Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00