Priorities, concerns, and potential compromises amongst urban forest stakeholders: international lessons from Aotearoa New Zealand

Abstract Urban forests provide numerous benefits including habitat for wildlife, improving human health, purifying air and water, and preventing and mitigating the effects of climate change. The need to protect and improve our urban forests will only increase as populations increase and cities densify and expand over time. However, urban forest establishment and maintenance is challenging due to a lack of effective policies, delays, lack of communication, inappropriate targets, and lack of recognition, disunity, or resourcing amongst stakeholders. Here we present the results from a joint urban forest symposium-workshop that sought to determine the priorities and challenges of different stakeholder groups in New Zealand, including arborists, ecologists, non-ecologist researchers, indigenous peoples, and planners. We synthesise these lessons as recommendations to improve urban forest planning, design, establishment, and minimise conflicts between stakeholder groups. While the highest priorities of each stakeholder group are fairly distinct, there are high levels of overlap in the general priorities and challenges they face in working towards advancing those priorities. We suggest a 3-phase framework to deliver progress that broadly considers (1) data collection, (2) policy development, and (3) resource development. We suggest this framework should be supported by continual monitoring and data sharing, an increased investment in green employment and education, and further recognition of urban foresters, indigenous communities, and ecologists. We suggest that an inclusive approach based on a shared understanding of forest values and removing barriers is most likely to result in long-term success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Ecosystems
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-025-01801-8
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Priorities, concerns, and potential compromises amongst urban forest stakeholders: international lessons from Aotearoa New Zealand

Yvette L. Dickinson, M. J. C. Walker, Margaret C. Stanley, Rebecca Kiddle et al.
Urban Ecosystems
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Priorities, concerns, and potential compromises amongst urban forest stakeholders: international lessons from Aotearoa New Zealand

Yvette L. Dickinson, M. J. C. Walker, Margaret C. Stanley, Rebecca Kiddle, Jonathon Avery, David J. Stejskal, Keith Elliot, Sylvia Tapuke, David Spencer, Robyn Simcock, Mirjam Schindler, Tara Chapman, Tim Barnard, Daniel R. Richards, D. G. Hayes, William Melville, Claire Freeman, Colin D. Meurk, Brian Martin, Alison Slade, Kelly Hertzog, Justin Morgenroth, Zoë Avery, Thomas F. Carlin, Tipene Merritt, Christopher Walsh, Tamara Mutu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Urban forests provide numerous benefits including habitat for wildlife, improving human health, purifying air and water, and preventing and mitigating the effects of climate change. The need to protect and improve our urban forests will only increase as populations increase and cities densify and expand over time. However, urban forest establishment and maintenance is challenging due to a lack of effective policies, delays, lack of communication, inappropriate targets, and lack of recognition, disunity, or resourcing amongst stakeholders. Here we present the results from a joint urban forest symposium-workshop that sought to determine the priorities and challenges of different stakeholder groups in New Zealand, including arborists, ecologists, non-ecologist researchers, indigenous peoples, and planners. We synthesise these lessons as recommendations to improve urban forest planning, design, establishment, and minimise conflicts between stakeholder groups. While the highest priorities of each stakeholder group are fairly distinct, there are high levels of overlap in the general priorities and challenges they face in working towards advancing those priorities. We suggest a 3-phase framework to deliver progress that broadly considers (1) data collection, (2) policy development, and (3) resource development. We suggest this framework should be supported by continual monitoring and data sharing, an increased investment in green employment and education, and further recognition of urban foresters, indigenous communities, and ecologists. We suggest that an inclusive approach based on a shared understanding of forest values and removing barriers is most likely to result in long-term success.

Urban EcosystemsVol. 28(5)
Treasury (NZ), TATI University College (MY), Statistics New Zealand (NZ), University of Auckland (NZ), Scion (NZ), University of Canterbury (NZ), New Zealand Council for Educational Research (NZ), Auckland Council (NZ), Wellington City Council (NZ), Health Research Council of New Zealand (NZ), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Te Whare Wānanga o Awanuiārangi (NZ), Future Forests Research (NZ), Christchurch City Council (NZ), Ipswich City Council (AU), Christchurch Clinical Studies Trust (NZ), University of Otago (NZ), Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.