Clinical and Molecular Profiling of Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Cohort Study of BRAF-Mutated Cases from a Tertiary Centre

<b>Introduction:</b> Increasingly, identification of BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer is used to guide management and predict cancer behaviour. There is, however, still significant diversity within this cohort of patients, both in terms of clinical phenotype and treatment outcomes. This may be explained, at least in part, by differences between classes of BRAF mutations and the presence of concomitant mutations. <b>Methods:</b> We present a retrospective cohort study of sequential patients diagnosed with BRAF-mutated (V600 and non-V600) colorectal cancer between 2014 and 2022. Information regarding presentation, treatment outcomes and molecular subtype was identified using the electronic medical record. <b>Results:</b> This study included 406 patients with BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer, 253 (228 <sup>V600</sup>BRAF) of whom had localised disease and 153 (137 <sup>V600</sup>BRAF) with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. In patients with localised disease at diagnosis, the <sup>V600</sup>BRAF mutation was associated with older median age (73 vs. 63 years, <i>p</i> = 0.04) and a higher prevalence of right-sided primary (73% vs. 40%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), mismatch repair deficiency (56% vs. 8%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and faster time to disease relapse (<i>p</i> = 0.006). In the metastatic setting, <sup>non-V600</sup>BRAF mutation was associated with a higher prevalence of KRAS mutation (27% vs. 1%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), NRAS mutation (14% vs. 3%, <i>p</i> = 0.04) and PIK3CA mutation (33% vs. 8%, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Mismatch repair deficiency was more common in patients with <sup>V600</sup>BRAF mutations than in those with <sup>non-V600</sup>BRAF mutations (20% vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.01). The median survival of patients with the <sup>V600</sup>BRAF mutation was 14 months, and 34 months in those with <sup>non-V600</sup>BRAF mutations. Concomitant RNF43 mutation in metastatic disease, was associated with a significantly higher incidence of disease control from combined BRAF and EGFR inhibition, when compared to those without an RNF43 mutation (100% vs. 54%, <i>p</i> = 0.02). <b>Conclusions:</b> Presentation and outcomes of BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer are heterogenous. The type of BRAF mutation, and the presence of concomitant RNF43 mutation, may explain some of the differences in cancer behaviour. Routine reporting of RNF43 mutations would assist clinicians to give more personalised treatment recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090507
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Molecular Profiling of Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Cohort Study of BRAF-Mutated Cases from a Tertiary Centre

Xin Liu, Naureen Starling, Paula Proszek, Ian Chau et al.
1 citations
Current Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
1.05
article

Clinical and Molecular Profiling of Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Cohort Study of BRAF-Mutated Cases from a Tertiary Centre

Xin Liu, Naureen Starling, Paula Proszek, Ian Chau, Julia Freckelton, David Cunningham, Charlotte Fribbens, Iris J. M. Levink, Justin Mencel, D. Brooks, Sheela Rao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Increasingly, identification of BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer is used to guide management and predict cancer behaviour. There is, however, still significant diversity within this cohort of patients, both in terms of clinical phenotype and treatment outcomes. This may be explained, at least in part, by differences between classes of BRAF mutations and the presence of concomitant mutations. <b>Methods:</b> We present a retrospective cohort study of sequential patients diagnosed with BRAF-mutated (V600 and non-V600) colorectal cancer between 2014 and 2022. Information regarding presentation, treatment outcomes and molecular subtype was identified using the electronic medical record. <b>Results:</b> This study included 406 patients with BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer, 253 (228 <sup>V600</sup>BRAF) of whom had localised disease and 153 (137 <sup>V600</sup>BRAF) with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. In patients with localised disease at diagnosis, the <sup>V600</sup>BRAF mutation was associated with older median age (73 vs. 63 years, <i>p</i> = 0.04) and a higher prevalence of right-sided primary (73% vs. 40%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), mismatch repair deficiency (56% vs. 8%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and faster time to disease relapse (<i>p</i> = 0.006). In the metastatic setting, <sup>non-V600</sup>BRAF mutation was associated with a higher prevalence of KRAS mutation (27% vs. 1%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), NRAS mutation (14% vs. 3%, <i>p</i> = 0.04) and PIK3CA mutation (33% vs. 8%, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Mismatch repair deficiency was more common in patients with <sup>V600</sup>BRAF mutations than in those with <sup>non-V600</sup>BRAF mutations (20% vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.01). The median survival of patients with the <sup>V600</sup>BRAF mutation was 14 months, and 34 months in those with <sup>non-V600</sup>BRAF mutations. Concomitant RNF43 mutation in metastatic disease, was associated with a significantly higher incidence of disease control from combined BRAF and EGFR inhibition, when compared to those without an RNF43 mutation (100% vs. 54%, <i>p</i> = 0.02). <b>Conclusions:</b> Presentation and outcomes of BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer are heterogenous. The type of BRAF mutation, and the presence of concomitant RNF43 mutation, may explain some of the differences in cancer behaviour. Routine reporting of RNF43 mutations would assist clinicians to give more personalised treatment recommendations.

Current OncologyVol. 32(9)
Institute of Cancer Research (GB), Royal Marsden Hospital (GB)
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.