Traditional agroforestry systems in Europe revisited: a systematic review

Abstract Traditional agroforestry systems (TAFs) in Europe represent an interface between agriculture and biodiversity conservation, being able to offer sustainable production while supporting diverse ecosystems often with unique species assemblages. This systematic review synthesises research on TAFs conducted between 1992 and 2024 using the PRISMA methodology. We analysed 232 studies to assess TAFs types, their distribution, biodiversity significance, and ecosystem services’ contributions across Europe. The findings highlight regional variations, with dehesa / montado systems dominating Southern Europe and traditional orchards and wood pastures being prevalent in Central and Eastern Europe. Our review gives evidence that TAFs provide multifaceted ecosystem services, such as carbon sequestration, soil fertility enhancement, water regulation, and cultural heritage preservation. Additionally, TAFs harbour a rich biodiversity, particularly among vascular plants, birds, and insects, whose ecological roles are pivotal to the ecological functioning of these systems. Despite their significance, studies indicate that a decline in economic viability and changing land-use patterns have threatened the future of TAFs. This review emphasises the need for innovative management practices that integrate traditional knowledge, alongside political and public support, to ensure the long-term conservation and restoration of TAFs in Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agroforestry Systems
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01335-0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traditional agroforestry systems in Europe revisited: a systematic review

Tobías Plieninger, Stefan Zerbe, Martin Sauerwein, Gianmaria Bonari et al.
3 citations
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
19.30
article

Traditional agroforestry systems in Europe revisited: a systematic review

Tobías Plieninger, Stefan Zerbe, Martin Sauerwein, Gianmaria Bonari, Le Thuy Hang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Traditional agroforestry systems (TAFs) in Europe represent an interface between agriculture and biodiversity conservation, being able to offer sustainable production while supporting diverse ecosystems often with unique species assemblages. This systematic review synthesises research on TAFs conducted between 1992 and 2024 using the PRISMA methodology. We analysed 232 studies to assess TAFs types, their distribution, biodiversity significance, and ecosystem services’ contributions across Europe. The findings highlight regional variations, with dehesa / montado systems dominating Southern Europe and traditional orchards and wood pastures being prevalent in Central and Eastern Europe. Our review gives evidence that TAFs provide multifaceted ecosystem services, such as carbon sequestration, soil fertility enhancement, water regulation, and cultural heritage preservation. Additionally, TAFs harbour a rich biodiversity, particularly among vascular plants, birds, and insects, whose ecological roles are pivotal to the ecological functioning of these systems. Despite their significance, studies indicate that a decline in economic viability and changing land-use patterns have threatened the future of TAFs. This review emphasises the need for innovative management practices that integrate traditional knowledge, alongside political and public support, to ensure the long-term conservation and restoration of TAFs in Europe.

Agroforestry SystemsVol. 99(8)
University of Siena (IT), University of Kassel (DE), University of Hildesheim (DE), University of Göttingen (DE), University of Palermo (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
19.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.