Teaching Creative Writing within Philology Programs: Theoretical, Methodological and Didactic Aspects

The article substantiates and describes a system of academic courses titled “Creative Writing: The Philological Aspect” (variants include specialized courses: “Writing and Reading Practices: Between Scholarship and Creativity”, “Creative Writing: Crafting Narrative Texts”; and an interfaculty course: “The Art of Storytelling: How to Write and Analyze Prose?”). These courses share a similar structure despite being offered at different levels of professional training: as core electives for Philology faculties (specialized courses) or as mandatory electives for other faculties (interfaculty course). The course objectives are: (1) To equip students with a metalanguage for analyzing literary narrative texts – specifically, a framework for describing the “grammar of plot” and the narrative function of individual techniques; (2) To provide practical application of analytical skills for narrative structures through experiential exercises (e.g., writing a short story with optional predefined plot constraints). The relevance of such courses stems from: (1) Growing demand for narrative forms of meaning exchange in both popular and academic cultures – from podcasts, journalistic essays, and popular science lectures to scholarly articles and monographs; (2) Rapid development and institutionalization of Creative Writing as a discipline in Russian institutions (e.g., HSE University, SPbSU) amid crisis trends in theoretical literary studies, which increasingly prioritize metascience over analyzing aesthetic meaning. The explication of literary structures through theoretical analysis and practical writing imitation creates a productive synergy between: traditional philological disciplines (e.g., Introduction to Literary Theory, Fundamentals of Text Analysis); interdisciplinary/experimental fields (e.g., creative writing for authors/translators, storytelling for journalists). This interdisciplinary reach ensures: (1) expanded professional competencies for philologists as future educators/practitioners (philological courses); (2) philological training for humanities specialists (historians, sociologists, journalists) to enhance their professional work (interfaculty course).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2025-3-166-180
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Teacher Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching Creative Writing within Philology Programs: Theoretical, Methodological and Didactic Aspects

Анна Швец
Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics
Educational Methods and Teacher Development
article

Teaching Creative Writing within Philology Programs: Theoretical, Methodological and Didactic Aspects

Анна Швец
article en

Abstract

The article substantiates and describes a system of academic courses titled “Creative Writing: The Philological Aspect” (variants include specialized courses: “Writing and Reading Practices: Between Scholarship and Creativity”, “Creative Writing: Crafting Narrative Texts”; and an interfaculty course: “The Art of Storytelling: How to Write and Analyze Prose?”). These courses share a similar structure despite being offered at different levels of professional training: as core electives for Philology faculties (specialized courses) or as mandatory electives for other faculties (interfaculty course). The course objectives are: (1) To equip students with a metalanguage for analyzing literary narrative texts – specifically, a framework for describing the “grammar of plot” and the narrative function of individual techniques; (2) To provide practical application of analytical skills for narrative structures through experiential exercises (e.g., writing a short story with optional predefined plot constraints). The relevance of such courses stems from: (1) Growing demand for narrative forms of meaning exchange in both popular and academic cultures – from podcasts, journalistic essays, and popular science lectures to scholarly articles and monographs; (2) Rapid development and institutionalization of Creative Writing as a discipline in Russian institutions (e.g., HSE University, SPbSU) amid crisis trends in theoretical literary studies, which increasingly prioritize metascience over analyzing aesthetic meaning. The explication of literary structures through theoretical analysis and practical writing imitation creates a productive synergy between: traditional philological disciplines (e.g., Introduction to Literary Theory, Fundamentals of Text Analysis); interdisciplinary/experimental fields (e.g., creative writing for authors/translators, storytelling for journalists). This interdisciplinary reach ensures: (1) expanded professional competencies for philologists as future educators/practitioners (philological courses); (2) philological training for humanities specialists (historians, sociologists, journalists) to enhance their professional work (interfaculty course).

Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Educational Methods and Teacher Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.