B – 39 Identifying Memory Impairment in Current and Former Military Special Operators

Abstract Objective United States military special operators are exposed to training and missions in extreme conditions that can lead to injuries and health problems affecting their physical, psychological, and cognitive functioning. We applied new algorithms for identifying memory impairment in military special operators undergoing neuropsychological evaluations. Method Data from 900 individuals ages 69 and younger comprising the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition standardization sample were used to develop algorithms. Memory tests included the immediate and delayed subtests for Logical Memory, Verbal Paired Associates, and Visual Reproduction. New algorithms for defining memory impairment were applied to 81 current and former military special operators undergoing a clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Results Most special operators (77.8%) reported having significant memory problems over the past year. Mann-Whitney U tests revealed no significant differences in memory test scores between special operators who reported memory problems versus those who did not. Having three or more memory scores ≤16th percentile (scaled score [SS]≤7) occurred in 19.9% of the WMS-IV normative sample and 1.2% of the military special operators. Having three or more memory scores ≤9th percentile (SS≤6) occurred in 9.6% of the WMS-IV normative sample and having three or more memory scores ≤5th percentile (SS≤5) occurred in 5.0% of the normative sample. None of the military special operators met either of the latter criteria for memory impairment. Conclusion Perceived memory problems were prevalent, but objectively measured memory impairment was rare in military special operators undergoing neuropsychological evaluations. Focusing on modifiable factors in treatment and rehabilitation may enhance cognitive functioning and overall quality of life.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf084.190
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B – 39 Identifying Memory Impairment in Current and Former Military Special Operators

Grant L. Iverson, James A. Holdnack, Alicia Kissinger-Knox
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

B – 39 Identifying Memory Impairment in Current and Former Military Special Operators

Grant L. Iverson, James A. Holdnack, Alicia Kissinger-Knox
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective United States military special operators are exposed to training and missions in extreme conditions that can lead to injuries and health problems affecting their physical, psychological, and cognitive functioning. We applied new algorithms for identifying memory impairment in military special operators undergoing neuropsychological evaluations. Method Data from 900 individuals ages 69 and younger comprising the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition standardization sample were used to develop algorithms. Memory tests included the immediate and delayed subtests for Logical Memory, Verbal Paired Associates, and Visual Reproduction. New algorithms for defining memory impairment were applied to 81 current and former military special operators undergoing a clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Results Most special operators (77.8%) reported having significant memory problems over the past year. Mann-Whitney U tests revealed no significant differences in memory test scores between special operators who reported memory problems versus those who did not. Having three or more memory scores ≤16th percentile (scaled score [SS]≤7) occurred in 19.9% of the WMS-IV normative sample and 1.2% of the military special operators. Having three or more memory scores ≤9th percentile (SS≤6) occurred in 9.6% of the WMS-IV normative sample and having three or more memory scores ≤5th percentile (SS≤5) occurred in 5.0% of the normative sample. None of the military special operators met either of the latter criteria for memory impairment. Conclusion Perceived memory problems were prevalent, but objectively measured memory impairment was rare in military special operators undergoing neuropsychological evaluations. Focusing on modifiable factors in treatment and rehabilitation may enhance cognitive functioning and overall quality of life.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(Supplement_2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

B – 39 Identifying Memory Impairment in Current and Former Military Special Operators — Grant L. Iverson, James A. Holdnack, et al. · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS