Top Down and Bottom Up: Using the Deductive-Inductive Dual Pillar Integration Process (DID-PIP) to Answer Multilevel-Systems Questions

Despite increasing calls for transparent integration, the mixed methods field lacks replicable approaches that center theory to answer multilevel-systems questions. We describe the Deductive-Inductive Dual Pillar Integration Process (DID-PIP), a five-phase integration technique for multilevel research. The DID-PIP centers a theoretical framework to generate meta-inferential understandings of multilevel systems that moves beyond confirmation or rejection of theoretical codes. Drawing from sociological, qualitative paradigms, and mixed methods reporting standards, we outline the theoretical rationale, define the DID-PIP, and illustrate its application through a literature synthesis of racial-equity monitoring in special education policy. This contribution is novel because it provides researchers with a structured, theory-driven integration approach that is methodologically rigorous and builds understandings of phenomena within and across multilevel systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898251381919
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Top Down and Bottom Up: Using the Deductive-Inductive Dual Pillar Integration Process (DID-PIP) to Answer Multilevel-Systems Questions

Roey Ahram, Allison R. Firestone, Alexandra Aylward, Natasha M. Strassfeld et al.
Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Top Down and Bottom Up: Using the Deductive-Inductive Dual Pillar Integration Process (DID-PIP) to Answer Multilevel-Systems Questions

Roey Ahram, Allison R. Firestone, Alexandra Aylward, Natasha M. Strassfeld, Catherine Kramarczuk Voulgarides, James Jeong
article en

Abstract

Despite increasing calls for transparent integration, the mixed methods field lacks replicable approaches that center theory to answer multilevel-systems questions. We describe the Deductive-Inductive Dual Pillar Integration Process (DID-PIP), a five-phase integration technique for multilevel research. The DID-PIP centers a theoretical framework to generate meta-inferential understandings of multilevel systems that moves beyond confirmation or rejection of theoretical codes. Drawing from sociological, qualitative paradigms, and mixed methods reporting standards, we outline the theoretical rationale, define the DID-PIP, and illustrate its application through a literature synthesis of racial-equity monitoring in special education policy. This contribution is novel because it provides researchers with a structured, theory-driven integration approach that is methodologically rigorous and builds understandings of phenomena within and across multilevel systems.

Journal of Mixed Methods ResearchVol. 20(2)
University of Nevada, Reno (US), City University of New York (US), Illinois Institute of Technology (US), Hunter College (US), San Francisco Unified School District (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.