A – 106 Antemortem Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuropathologic Change and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration on Autopsy

Abstract Objective Investigating antemortem diagnosis in cases of autopsy-confirmed neurodegenerative disease is critical to understand clinicopathologic concordance versus misdiagnosis. In addition, comorbid pathology can complicate clinicopathologic relationships. This study examined concordance between antemortem etiologic diagnoses (Alzheimer’s disease, AD; frontotemporal lobar degeneration, FTLD) and postmortem neuropathology (AD neuropathologic change, ADNC; FTLD; and comorbid ADNC/FTLD). Method We compared National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center clinical data at final visit before death in individuals from 3 autopsy groups: intermediate-to-high ADNC, FTLD, and comorbid ADNC/FTLD. Primary clinical (etiologic) diagnosis was based on available clinical, cognitive, and biomarker data. Results Of 919 individuals, 94 (age=84±10, 46%F) had comorbid ADNC/FTLD, 590 had ADNC only (age=84±11), and 235 had FTLD only (age=73±12). The FTLD-only group was younger at last visit and death (p’s<.001), while groups did not differ on other demographics or cognitive status. Within the comorbid group, 81% had cognitive impairment with the following presumed etiologies: 62% AD, 32% progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, or other FTLD, and 7% with non-AD/FTLD etiologies. Within the ADNC-only group, 86% had cognitive impairment, with 82% presumed due to AD (concordant), and the remaining 18% misdiagnosed with other etiologies. For the FTLD-only group, 86% had cognitive impairment, with 74% presumed due to FTLD (concordant), and the remaining 26% misdiagnosed with other etiologies. Conclusion Etiological AD diagnosis was twice as likely as FTLD in cognitively-impaired individuals with comorbid ADNC/FTLD neuropathology on autopsy. Misdiagnosis was not uncommon in pure ADNC or FTLD, highlighting the often discrepant nature of clinicopathologic correlation which can lead to ineffective treatment and inaccurate prognosis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf084.128
Primary Topic
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A – 106 Antemortem Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuropathologic Change and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration on Autopsy

Molly Split, Megan S. Barker, Daliah Ross, Zachary J. Kunicki et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
article

A – 106 Antemortem Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuropathologic Change and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration on Autopsy

Molly Split, Megan S. Barker, Daliah Ross, Zachary J. Kunicki, Rachel Keszycki, Sarah Prieto, Masood Manoochehri, Edward D. Huey, Alyssa N. De Vito
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Investigating antemortem diagnosis in cases of autopsy-confirmed neurodegenerative disease is critical to understand clinicopathologic concordance versus misdiagnosis. In addition, comorbid pathology can complicate clinicopathologic relationships. This study examined concordance between antemortem etiologic diagnoses (Alzheimer’s disease, AD; frontotemporal lobar degeneration, FTLD) and postmortem neuropathology (AD neuropathologic change, ADNC; FTLD; and comorbid ADNC/FTLD). Method We compared National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center clinical data at final visit before death in individuals from 3 autopsy groups: intermediate-to-high ADNC, FTLD, and comorbid ADNC/FTLD. Primary clinical (etiologic) diagnosis was based on available clinical, cognitive, and biomarker data. Results Of 919 individuals, 94 (age=84±10, 46%F) had comorbid ADNC/FTLD, 590 had ADNC only (age=84±11), and 235 had FTLD only (age=73±12). The FTLD-only group was younger at last visit and death (p’s<.001), while groups did not differ on other demographics or cognitive status. Within the comorbid group, 81% had cognitive impairment with the following presumed etiologies: 62% AD, 32% progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, or other FTLD, and 7% with non-AD/FTLD etiologies. Within the ADNC-only group, 86% had cognitive impairment, with 82% presumed due to AD (concordant), and the remaining 18% misdiagnosed with other etiologies. For the FTLD-only group, 86% had cognitive impairment, with 74% presumed due to FTLD (concordant), and the remaining 26% misdiagnosed with other etiologies. Conclusion Etiological AD diagnosis was twice as likely as FTLD in cognitively-impaired individuals with comorbid ADNC/FTLD neuropathology on autopsy. Misdiagnosis was not uncommon in pure ADNC or FTLD, highlighting the often discrepant nature of clinicopathologic correlation which can lead to ineffective treatment and inaccurate prognosis.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(Supplement_2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.