Impact of solar thermal energy and calcium looping implementation on biomass gasification for low-carbon hydrogen production

In the search of low-carbon hydrogen production routes, this study evaluates four biomass gasification processes: conventional steam gasification (CSG), sorption-enhanced gasification (SEG), and their solar-assisted variants (SSG and SSEG). The comparison focuses on three key aspects: hydrogen production, overall energy efficiency (to H 2 and power), and carbon capture potential (generation of a pure CO 2 process stream for storage or utilization). For a realistic comparison, a pseudo-equilibrium model of a double-bed gasifier was developed based on experimental correlations of char conversion under conventional and SEG conditions. The solar processes were designed for stable year-round operation, considering seasonal weather variations by appropriately dimensioning the heliostat field and the thermal and chemical energy storage systems, whose inventory dynamics were modelled. Both the gasifier and central solar tower models were rigorously validated with published data, enhancing the reliability of the results. Solar-assisted configurations significantly outperform non-solar ones in hydrogen production, with SSEG yielding 128 kg H 2 /ton biomass daf compared to 90–95 kg for non-solar options. SEG demonstrates superior carbon capture potential (76 %), while solar-assisted systems achieve higher energy efficiency (67–73 % vs. 60–63 % for non-solar). These results underscore the potential of solar-assisted gasification for sustainable hydrogen production, offering enhanced yields, improved efficiency, and substantial carbon capture capabilities. Future work will involve economic and environmental analysis to determine the best overall configuration. • Novel comparison of solar/non-solar biomass gasification for hydrogen production • Robust validation of gasifier and central solar plant models through published data • Dynamic modelling of thermal/chemical solids inventory for stable solar operation • Innovative sorption-enhanced solar gasification for in-situ CO 2 capture • Solar configurations offer higher energy efficiency and hydrogen yield.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering Journal
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.168635
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of solar thermal energy and calcium looping implementation on biomass gasification for low-carbon hydrogen production

William A. González, Agustín Aragón‐García, Alberto Gómez‐Barea, A.L. Villanueva Perales et al.
2 citations
Chemical Engineering Journal
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
1.35
article

Impact of solar thermal energy and calcium looping implementation on biomass gasification for low-carbon hydrogen production

William A. González, Agustín Aragón‐García, Alberto Gómez‐Barea, A.L. Villanueva Perales, Bernabé Alonso‐Fariñas, Diego Fuentes-Cano
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In the search of low-carbon hydrogen production routes, this study evaluates four biomass gasification processes: conventional steam gasification (CSG), sorption-enhanced gasification (SEG), and their solar-assisted variants (SSG and SSEG). The comparison focuses on three key aspects: hydrogen production, overall energy efficiency (to H 2 and power), and carbon capture potential (generation of a pure CO 2 process stream for storage or utilization). For a realistic comparison, a pseudo-equilibrium model of a double-bed gasifier was developed based on experimental correlations of char conversion under conventional and SEG conditions. The solar processes were designed for stable year-round operation, considering seasonal weather variations by appropriately dimensioning the heliostat field and the thermal and chemical energy storage systems, whose inventory dynamics were modelled. Both the gasifier and central solar tower models were rigorously validated with published data, enhancing the reliability of the results. Solar-assisted configurations significantly outperform non-solar ones in hydrogen production, with SSEG yielding 128 kg H 2 /ton biomass daf compared to 90–95 kg for non-solar options. SEG demonstrates superior carbon capture potential (76 %), while solar-assisted systems achieve higher energy efficiency (67–73 % vs. 60–63 % for non-solar). These results underscore the potential of solar-assisted gasification for sustainable hydrogen production, offering enhanced yields, improved efficiency, and substantial carbon capture capabilities. Future work will involve economic and environmental analysis to determine the best overall configuration. • Novel comparison of solar/non-solar biomass gasification for hydrogen production • Robust validation of gasifier and central solar plant models through published data • Dynamic modelling of thermal/chemical solids inventory for stable solar operation • Innovative sorption-enhanced solar gasification for in-situ CO 2 capture • Solar configurations offer higher energy efficiency and hydrogen yield.

Chemical Engineering JournalVol. 523
Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.