Unpacking gendered co‐participation in political violence: Women perpetrators of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda

Abstract How does gender influence participation in violence? Research shows that women are less likely than men to engage in direct violence. However, women remain consequential actors in conflicts. Drawing on gendered understandings of conflict, we argue that mobilization is shaped by gendered homophily within social networks. We theorize that both men and women are likely to mobilize with individuals of the same gender. However, this effect is more pronounced for women due to differences in how men and women are mobilized for conflict as well as other forms of political engagement. To test this argument, we utilize data from the 1994 genocide that targeted Tutsi in Rwanda. Using network analysis, we demonstrate the pivotal role women played in mobilizing other women to commit violence. This article broadens our understanding of network dynamics in conflict and emphasizes the importance of gendered differences in mobilization patterns for political processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Political Science
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.70007
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking gendered co‐participation in political violence: Women perpetrators of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda

Elizabeth L. Brannon, Jared Edgerton, Hollie Nyseth Nzitatira, Dagmar Heintze
American Journal of Political Science
Gender, Security, and Conflict
article

Unpacking gendered co‐participation in political violence: Women perpetrators of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda

Elizabeth L. Brannon, Jared Edgerton, Hollie Nyseth Nzitatira, Dagmar Heintze
article en

Abstract

Abstract How does gender influence participation in violence? Research shows that women are less likely than men to engage in direct violence. However, women remain consequential actors in conflicts. Drawing on gendered understandings of conflict, we argue that mobilization is shaped by gendered homophily within social networks. We theorize that both men and women are likely to mobilize with individuals of the same gender. However, this effect is more pronounced for women due to differences in how men and women are mobilized for conflict as well as other forms of political engagement. To test this argument, we utilize data from the 1994 genocide that targeted Tutsi in Rwanda. Using network analysis, we demonstrate the pivotal role women played in mobilizing other women to commit violence. This article broadens our understanding of network dynamics in conflict and emphasizes the importance of gendered differences in mobilization patterns for political processes.

American Journal of Political Science
Pennsylvania State University (US), The University of Texas at Dallas (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unpacking gendered co‐participation in political violence: Women perpetrators of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda — Elizabeth L. Brannon, Jared Edgerton, et al. · American Journal of Political Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS