Integrating Climate and Economic Predictors in Hybrid Prophet–(Q)LSTM Models for Sustainable National Energy Demand Forecasting: Evidence from The Netherlands
Forecasting national energy demand is challenging under climate variability and macroeconomic uncertainty. We assess whether hybrid Prophet–(Q)LSTM models that integrate climate and economic predictors improve long-horizon forecasts for The Netherlands. This study covers 2010–2024 and uses data from ENTSO-E (hourly load), KNMI and Copernicus/ERA5 (weather and climate indices), Statistics Netherlands (CBS), and the World Bank (macroeconomic and commodity series). We evaluate Prophet–LSTM and Prophet–QLSTM, each with and without stacking via XGBoost, under rolling-origin cross-validation; feature choice is guided by Bayesian optimisation. Stacking provides the largest and most consistent accuracy gains across horizons. The quantum-inspired variant performs on par with the classical ensemble while using a smaller recurrent core, indicating value as a complementary learner. Substantively, short-run variation is dominated by weather and calendar effects, whereas selected commodity and activity indicators stabilise longer-range baselines; combining both domains improves robustness to regime shifts. In sustainability terms, improved long-horizon accuracy supports renewable integration, resource adequacy, and lower curtailment by strengthening seasonal planning and demand-response scheduling. The pipeline demonstrates the feasibility of integrating quantum-inspired components into national planning workflows, using The Netherlands as a case study, while acknowledging simulator constraints and compute costs.
Authors
- Seyed Sahand Mohammadi Ziabari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-6714)
- Ali Mohammed Mansoor Alsahag
- Ruben Curiël
Institutions
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Sustainability
- Published
- 2025-09-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198687
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Energy Load and Power Forecasting
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.73