Retrospective Analysis of Spinal Cord Stimulation: 15-Year Single-Center Experience

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established neuromodulation technique for chronic pain management. This study evaluated outcomes and complications of SCS therapy across various chronic pain conditions. This retrospective, single-center cohort study analyzed 61 patients who received SCS implantation between January 2008 and December 2023. Treatment effectiveness was defined as a >50% reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Secondary outcomes included complications, revision requirements, and device longevity. Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) was the most common indication (73.8%), followed by peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (8.2%). Overall treatment effectiveness was achieved in 90.2% of patients, with 100% success rates for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), PVD, phantom pain, peripheral nerve damage, spinal tumor, and stroke-related neuropathic pain. Among FBSS patients, 86.7% achieved significant pain reduction. Patient satisfaction was high, with 82.0% reporting positive satisfaction (67.2% very satisfied, 14.8% partially satisfied). Revision surgery was required in 16.4% of cases, treatment termination occurred in 8.2%, and implantable pulse generator replacement was necessary in 18.0%. Treatment failure rate was only 3.3%. SCS demonstrated high treatment effectiveness and patient satisfaction across various chronic pain conditions. The favorable safety profile with low treatment failure rates supports SCS as an important component of comprehensive pain management strategies when applied with appropriate patient selection criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
OSMANGAZİ JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.1718154
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrospective Analysis of Spinal Cord Stimulation: 15-Year Single-Center Experience

Sinan Oğuzhan Ulukaya, Ayten Bılır, Ümit Akkemik, Tuba Tanyel Saraçoğlu et al.
OSMANGAZİ JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Pain Management and Treatment
article

Retrospective Analysis of Spinal Cord Stimulation: 15-Year Single-Center Experience

Sinan Oğuzhan Ulukaya, Ayten Bılır, Ümit Akkemik, Tuba Tanyel Saraçoğlu, Mehmet Sacit Güleç
article en

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established neuromodulation technique for chronic pain management. This study evaluated outcomes and complications of SCS therapy across various chronic pain conditions. This retrospective, single-center cohort study analyzed 61 patients who received SCS implantation between January 2008 and December 2023. Treatment effectiveness was defined as a >50% reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Secondary outcomes included complications, revision requirements, and device longevity. Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) was the most common indication (73.8%), followed by peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (8.2%). Overall treatment effectiveness was achieved in 90.2% of patients, with 100% success rates for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), PVD, phantom pain, peripheral nerve damage, spinal tumor, and stroke-related neuropathic pain. Among FBSS patients, 86.7% achieved significant pain reduction. Patient satisfaction was high, with 82.0% reporting positive satisfaction (67.2% very satisfied, 14.8% partially satisfied). Revision surgery was required in 16.4% of cases, treatment termination occurred in 8.2%, and implantable pulse generator replacement was necessary in 18.0%. Treatment failure rate was only 3.3%. SCS demonstrated high treatment effectiveness and patient satisfaction across various chronic pain conditions. The favorable safety profile with low treatment failure rates supports SCS as an important component of comprehensive pain management strategies when applied with appropriate patient selection criteria.

OSMANGAZİ JOURNAL OF MEDICINEVol. 47(6)
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Eskişehir Osmangazi University (TR)
Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.