“I’m just kidding”

Abstract This paper investigates the role of claims to non-seriousness in ‘jocular pretence’ teasing sequences ( Haugh 2016 ). Drawing on 50 hours of Greek scripted interactions from popular TV sitcoms, we examined 18 ‘biting’ ( Boxer & Cortés-Conde 1997 ) teases involving overt claims to non-seriousness. Our analysis adopts an interactional pragmatic approach ( Haugh 2013 ) with a particular focus on the sequential and moral/social implications of claims to non-seriousness, as well as on the ways these were informed by the conventions of the said genre. The analysis brings to the fore a systematic relation between the location and uptake of such claims, namely that they emerged after serious rejections of teases, and they were subsequently responded to in low-aligning ways. It also shows that these claims were used by teasers to project positive self-identities of politeness and sensitivity while preserving their relationship with the teasees. Overall, the analysis points to an intertwined relation between humour, identity, im/politeness-in-interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pragmatics & Cognition
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.24021.sal
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I’m just kidding”

Vasiliki Saloustrou, Vasia Tsami
Pragmatics & Cognition
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

“I’m just kidding”

Vasiliki Saloustrou, Vasia Tsami
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the role of claims to non-seriousness in ‘jocular pretence’ teasing sequences ( Haugh 2016 ). Drawing on 50 hours of Greek scripted interactions from popular TV sitcoms, we examined 18 ‘biting’ ( Boxer & Cortés-Conde 1997 ) teases involving overt claims to non-seriousness. Our analysis adopts an interactional pragmatic approach ( Haugh 2013 ) with a particular focus on the sequential and moral/social implications of claims to non-seriousness, as well as on the ways these were informed by the conventions of the said genre. The analysis brings to the fore a systematic relation between the location and uptake of such claims, namely that they emerged after serious rejections of teases, and they were subsequently responded to in low-aligning ways. It also shows that these claims were used by teasers to project positive self-identities of politeness and sensitivity while preserving their relationship with the teasees. Overall, the analysis points to an intertwined relation between humour, identity, im/politeness-in-interaction.

Pragmatics & CognitionVol. 32(1)
University of East Anglia (GB), University of Kent (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“I’m just kidding” — Vasiliki Saloustrou, Vasia Tsami · Pragmatics & Cognition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS