A – 62 Attention and Inhibitory Control Predict Affect Production in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

Abstract Objective The ability to intentionally generate clear, contextually appropriate affective expressions of emotion is crucial for social communication and often is impaired in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study examined whether inhibitory control and attention contribute to affect production abilities in autistic and typically developing youth, as these mechanisms may help suppress competing emotions, regulate intensity of emotional expression, and maintain focus to facilitate social learning. Method 165 children (ASD=116; TDC=49), ages 8–17, completed the Conners’ Continuous Auditory Test of Attention, a novel Affect Production Task (APT), and the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy facial and vocal affect recognition subtests. Age-scaled CATA commission errors score was used to quantify response inhibition and reaction time standard deviation quantified response time consistency, an indicator of attention. The APT prompted participants to express emotions (happy, sad, angry, afraid) through facial/vocal expression. Responses were audio/video recorded and classified by blinded raters as happy, sad, angry, afraid, or neutral. Accuracy was quantified via agreement between the task-prompted and rater-identified emotion. Results In the ASD group, poorer response inhibition significantly predicted less effective facial (β = –.303, p = .019) and vocal (β = –.261, p = .038) affect production after controlling for age and nonverbal IQ. In the TDC group, poorer response inhibition was unexpectedly associated with more effective facial affect production (β = .381, p = .045). Attention did not significantly predict affect production in either group, nor was this association mediated by affect recognition. Conclusion Inhibitory control may be a cognitive factor influencing affective communication.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf084.085
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A – 62 Attention and Inhibitory Control Predict Affect Production in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

Carly Demopoulos, Raghavan Narasimhan
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

A – 62 Attention and Inhibitory Control Predict Affect Production in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

Carly Demopoulos, Raghavan Narasimhan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective The ability to intentionally generate clear, contextually appropriate affective expressions of emotion is crucial for social communication and often is impaired in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study examined whether inhibitory control and attention contribute to affect production abilities in autistic and typically developing youth, as these mechanisms may help suppress competing emotions, regulate intensity of emotional expression, and maintain focus to facilitate social learning. Method 165 children (ASD=116; TDC=49), ages 8–17, completed the Conners’ Continuous Auditory Test of Attention, a novel Affect Production Task (APT), and the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy facial and vocal affect recognition subtests. Age-scaled CATA commission errors score was used to quantify response inhibition and reaction time standard deviation quantified response time consistency, an indicator of attention. The APT prompted participants to express emotions (happy, sad, angry, afraid) through facial/vocal expression. Responses were audio/video recorded and classified by blinded raters as happy, sad, angry, afraid, or neutral. Accuracy was quantified via agreement between the task-prompted and rater-identified emotion. Results In the ASD group, poorer response inhibition significantly predicted less effective facial (β = –.303, p = .019) and vocal (β = –.261, p = .038) affect production after controlling for age and nonverbal IQ. In the TDC group, poorer response inhibition was unexpectedly associated with more effective facial affect production (β = .381, p = .045). Attention did not significantly predict affect production in either group, nor was this association mediated by affect recognition. Conclusion Inhibitory control may be a cognitive factor influencing affective communication.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(Supplement_2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.