Cultural hybridity and ideological shifts: shaping the campus space of modern Chinese universities

This paper examines the development of modern universities in China between 1840 and 1949—a period marked by the negotiation and coexistence of diverse value systems. During this time, the university spirit integrated diverse civilizational cores, which is reflected in the spatial design of the campuses. Taking 25 modern Chinese universities as research subjects. Employing a bifurcated historical methodology and the theory of cultural hybridity, the research traces the history of university construction and outlines the historical framework of university spirit through material forms. The research reveals that cultural hybridity follows a phased pattern of “encounter—appropriation—adaptation—integration—new ecological form.” In the semi-colonial context, diverse actors actively participated in dynamic processes of cultural hybridization, which profoundly shaped spatial forms. The transformation of the modern university spirit is reflected in the creative translation of spatial morphology. Based on these findings, the study proposes a dynamic model for campus heritage conservation, viewing the campus as a continuously evolving whole. Moving beyond the research paradigm of architectural history, it introduces a multi-threaded model of cultural hybridity, offering historical insights for cultivating a distinctive university identity in the era of globalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05781-0
Citations
4
Primary Topic
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural hybridity and ideological shifts: shaping the campus space of modern Chinese universities

Zilyu Ye, Yucong Zheng, Tao Jin, Zhibo Wang et al.
4 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
16.81
article

Cultural hybridity and ideological shifts: shaping the campus space of modern Chinese universities

Zilyu Ye, Yucong Zheng, Tao Jin, Zhibo Wang, Luyuan Wang, Rui Liu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the development of modern universities in China between 1840 and 1949—a period marked by the negotiation and coexistence of diverse value systems. During this time, the university spirit integrated diverse civilizational cores, which is reflected in the spatial design of the campuses. Taking 25 modern Chinese universities as research subjects. Employing a bifurcated historical methodology and the theory of cultural hybridity, the research traces the history of university construction and outlines the historical framework of university spirit through material forms. The research reveals that cultural hybridity follows a phased pattern of “encounter—appropriation—adaptation—integration—new ecological form.” In the semi-colonial context, diverse actors actively participated in dynamic processes of cultural hybridization, which profoundly shaped spatial forms. The transformation of the modern university spirit is reflected in the creative translation of spatial morphology. Based on these findings, the study proposes a dynamic model for campus heritage conservation, viewing the campus as a continuously evolving whole. Moving beyond the research paradigm of architectural history, it introduces a multi-threaded model of cultural hybridity, offering historical insights for cultivating a distinctive university identity in the era of globalization.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Guangzhou Design Institute (CN), South China University of Technology (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
16.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.