Analysis of Retractions in Nursing from Publications Between 2000 and 2024: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Retraction Watch

There has been a significant increase in scientific publications in recent years, and the nursing field has been no exception. Consequently, the number of publications containing errors that lead to document retractions has also increased. It is essential to understand and delve into this phenomenon within nursing research. <b>Objective:</b> This study aims to identify and analyze the retractions of scientific publications in nursing research worldwide between 2000 and 2024. <b>Methodology:</b> This is a descriptive and cross-sectional study with a bibliometric approach. Data were collected using the Retraction Watch database, from which 408 retracted documents related to nursing research were extracted. <b>Results:</b> Over the last 25 years (2000-2024), a total of 408 documents in the nursing field have been retracted, with the majority concentrated in the 2020-2024 period, accounting for 84.8%. Ethical misconduct was the cause of retraction in 87.3% of the cases. Of the 408 retracted documents, 42.6% involved human participants in research or control groups, totaling 21,369 patients who were part of flawed studies. <b>Conclusions:</b> It is crucial that nursing research remains rigorous and adheres to bioethical standards, as these guide evidence-based nursing practice. Flawed literature can have significant consequences for patient health and care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Reports
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15100349
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Retractions in Nursing from Publications Between 2000 and 2024: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Retraction Watch

Elizabeth Solís-Albanese, Ezequiel Martínez Rojas, Cristian Zahn-Muñoz, María Paz Contreras-Muñoz
2 citations
Nursing Reports
Academic integrity and plagiarism
4.73
article

Analysis of Retractions in Nursing from Publications Between 2000 and 2024: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Retraction Watch

Elizabeth Solís-Albanese, Ezequiel Martínez Rojas, Cristian Zahn-Muñoz, María Paz Contreras-Muñoz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

There has been a significant increase in scientific publications in recent years, and the nursing field has been no exception. Consequently, the number of publications containing errors that lead to document retractions has also increased. It is essential to understand and delve into this phenomenon within nursing research. <b>Objective:</b> This study aims to identify and analyze the retractions of scientific publications in nursing research worldwide between 2000 and 2024. <b>Methodology:</b> This is a descriptive and cross-sectional study with a bibliometric approach. Data were collected using the Retraction Watch database, from which 408 retracted documents related to nursing research were extracted. <b>Results:</b> Over the last 25 years (2000-2024), a total of 408 documents in the nursing field have been retracted, with the majority concentrated in the 2020-2024 period, accounting for 84.8%. Ethical misconduct was the cause of retraction in 87.3% of the cases. Of the 408 retracted documents, 42.6% involved human participants in research or control groups, totaling 21,369 patients who were part of flawed studies. <b>Conclusions:</b> It is crucial that nursing research remains rigorous and adheres to bioethical standards, as these guide evidence-based nursing practice. Flawed literature can have significant consequences for patient health and care.

Nursing ReportsVol. 15(10)
Universidad de Los Lagos (CL), Arturo Prat University (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of Retractions in Nursing from Publications Between 2000 and 2024: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Retraction Watch — Elizabeth Solís-Albanese, Ezequiel Martínez Rojas, et al. · Nursing Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS