Preferences of ESL Teachers and Student Reactions to Corrective Feedback: A Study at Chittagong University, Bangladesh

This mixed-methods study examined ESL teacher preference in corrective feedback strategy and students' reaction towards the feedback demands at Chittagong University, Bangladesh, to address the gap in comprehending the teacher-student interaction during feedback. The data was gathered by means of surveys and focus groups among teachers and students to examine the preferences of the feedback strategy and responses of learners. The study found that the teacher's preferences were highly positive towards the use of an indirect feedback strategy, especially recasting and clarification requests. There was a high alignment related to teacher preferences to the actual classroom practice. The students expressed highly positive responses to the corrective feedback of complex adaptive mechanisms and high receptivity. Teachers managed to use the strategies of their choice even with systematic obstacles such as limited time and large classes. The results disprove the presuppositions regarding implementation differences in language teaching and affirm that good corrective feedback entails compatibility between teacher preparation, student receptivity, and institutional support but cannot be applied universally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Critical Studies in language and literature
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46809/jcsll.v6i6.394
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preferences of ESL Teachers and Student Reactions to Corrective Feedback: A Study at Chittagong University, Bangladesh

Kamal Uddin
Journal of Critical Studies in language and literature
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Preferences of ESL Teachers and Student Reactions to Corrective Feedback: A Study at Chittagong University, Bangladesh

Kamal Uddin
article en

Abstract

This mixed-methods study examined ESL teacher preference in corrective feedback strategy and students' reaction towards the feedback demands at Chittagong University, Bangladesh, to address the gap in comprehending the teacher-student interaction during feedback. The data was gathered by means of surveys and focus groups among teachers and students to examine the preferences of the feedback strategy and responses of learners. The study found that the teacher's preferences were highly positive towards the use of an indirect feedback strategy, especially recasting and clarification requests. There was a high alignment related to teacher preferences to the actual classroom practice. The students expressed highly positive responses to the corrective feedback of complex adaptive mechanisms and high receptivity. Teachers managed to use the strategies of their choice even with systematic obstacles such as limited time and large classes. The results disprove the presuppositions regarding implementation differences in language teaching and affirm that good corrective feedback entails compatibility between teacher preparation, student receptivity, and institutional support but cannot be applied universally.

Journal of Critical Studies in language and literatureVol. 6(6)
University of Chittagong (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preferences of ESL Teachers and Student Reactions to Corrective Feedback: A Study at Chittagong University, Bangladesh — Kamal Uddin · Journal of Critical Studies in language and literature (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS