Breast cancer Intraoperative Margin Assessment using specimen PET-CT (BIMAP)

Positive surgical margins in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer occur in 20% of cases, making intraoperative margin assessment (IMA) crucial to avoid re-operations. This study evaluated specimen PET-CT imaging for IMA in 41 patients undergoing BCS. Specimen PET-CT imaging was performed with the ß-CUBE/X-CUBE (MOLECUBES) or the AURA 10 (XEOS). Seven physicians, with varying experience, assessed margin status postoperatively as positive, close (≤1 mm), or negative using PET-CT images at 10 min acquisition time and low reconstructed [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG dose (0.8MBq/kg). Close margins on PET-CT were analyzed once as positive and once as negative. Histopathology was the gold standard. The proposed technique showed 91% sensitivity and 86% specificity for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Histopathology identified 9 positive margins in 31 IDC cases; 88% were detected by all physicians on specimen PET-CT whereas standard of care identified 44%. Therefore, specimen PET-CT will improve IMA in BCS and potentially reduce re-operation rates. The trial is registered since 20/01/2020 on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04343079) with the title: "Intra-operative PET-CT: a Novel Approach to Determine Excision Margins in Lumpectomy Breast Cancer".

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Breast Cancer
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-025-00818-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breast cancer Intraoperative Margin Assessment using specimen PET-CT (BIMAP)

Hannelore Denys, Koen Van de Vijver, Menekse Göker, Rawand Salihi et al.
2 citations
npj Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
1.87
article

Breast cancer Intraoperative Margin Assessment using specimen PET-CT (BIMAP)

Hannelore Denys, Koen Van de Vijver, Menekse Göker, Rawand Salihi, Giovanni Cisternino, Liv Veldeman, Geert Braems, Bliede Van den Broeck, Anne-Sofie De Crem, Philippe Tummers, Glenn Vergauwen, Sigi Hendrickx, Jens Debacker, Chris Monten, Kathia De Man, Herman Depypere, Pieter De Visschere
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Positive surgical margins in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer occur in 20% of cases, making intraoperative margin assessment (IMA) crucial to avoid re-operations. This study evaluated specimen PET-CT imaging for IMA in 41 patients undergoing BCS. Specimen PET-CT imaging was performed with the ß-CUBE/X-CUBE (MOLECUBES) or the AURA 10 (XEOS). Seven physicians, with varying experience, assessed margin status postoperatively as positive, close (≤1 mm), or negative using PET-CT images at 10 min acquisition time and low reconstructed [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG dose (0.8MBq/kg). Close margins on PET-CT were analyzed once as positive and once as negative. Histopathology was the gold standard. The proposed technique showed 91% sensitivity and 86% specificity for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Histopathology identified 9 positive margins in 31 IDC cases; 88% were detected by all physicians on specimen PET-CT whereas standard of care identified 44%. Therefore, specimen PET-CT will improve IMA in BCS and potentially reduce re-operation rates. The trial is registered since 20/01/2020 on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04343079) with the title: "Intra-operative PET-CT: a Novel Approach to Determine Excision Margins in Lumpectomy Breast Cancer".

npj Breast CancerVol. 11(1)
HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Ghent University (BE), Cancer Research Institute Ghent (BE), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.