How to quantify respiratory effort and drive in critically ill children?

Abstract The emergence of the concepts of patient self-inflicted lung injury and lung and diaphragm-protective ventilation has renewed interest in quantifying respiratory drive, respiratory effort, and work of breathing in real-time and at the bedside. Measurements derived from electromyography of respiratory muscles and esophageal manometry are the gold standard, but their current use in pediatric ICUs is scarce. There are other direct and indirect methods to quantify respiratory drive and effort that have been validated in critically ill pediatric patients. Direct methods have been adequately tested, specifically to customize the level of support provided from the acute phase to weaning from mechanical ventilation. Promising indirect methods may be the first step, and some of them have been adequately validated. Given the heterogeneity of the pediatric population and the scarcity of cut-off thresholds, decisions must be based on the trajectory of drive and effort, preferably using a multimodal approach. In this review, we summarize the current state of the art regarding direct methods and new tools for quantifying respiratory drive and effort, including their relevance and limitations in decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intensive Care Medicine – Paediatric and Neonatal
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44253-025-00098-x
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to quantify respiratory effort and drive in critically ill children?

María Consuelo Bachmann, Pablo Cruces, Muneyuki Takeuchi, Paola Caviedes
Intensive Care Medicine – Paediatric and Neonatal
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

How to quantify respiratory effort and drive in critically ill children?

María Consuelo Bachmann, Pablo Cruces, Muneyuki Takeuchi, Paola Caviedes
article en

Abstract

Abstract The emergence of the concepts of patient self-inflicted lung injury and lung and diaphragm-protective ventilation has renewed interest in quantifying respiratory drive, respiratory effort, and work of breathing in real-time and at the bedside. Measurements derived from electromyography of respiratory muscles and esophageal manometry are the gold standard, but their current use in pediatric ICUs is scarce. There are other direct and indirect methods to quantify respiratory drive and effort that have been validated in critically ill pediatric patients. Direct methods have been adequately tested, specifically to customize the level of support provided from the acute phase to weaning from mechanical ventilation. Promising indirect methods may be the first step, and some of them have been adequately validated. Given the heterogeneity of the pediatric population and the scarcity of cut-off thresholds, decisions must be based on the trajectory of drive and effort, preferably using a multimodal approach. In this review, we summarize the current state of the art regarding direct methods and new tools for quantifying respiratory drive and effort, including their relevance and limitations in decision-making.

Intensive Care Medicine – Paediatric and NeonatalVol. 3(1)
Universidad de Los Andes, Chile (CL), Hospital Luis Calvo Mackenna (CL), National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP), Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CL)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.