Effect of 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch Pre-Administration for Reduction of Pain on Propofol Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Pain on propofol injection has been a matter of concern over the years. However, even with multi-modal techniques, pain on propofol injection is not abolished completely. Colloids modify the vascular endothelium and prevent contact activation of various substances. Pre administration of colloids may prevent contact activation of vascular endothelium by propofol. Aims and Objectives: To study the effect of 6% HES on the incidence of pain on propofol injection, and occurrence of any adverse reaction. Materials and Methods: This double blinded randomized study included 68 patients of the ASA I and II patients and 18-65 years old who underwent elective surgery. The patients were randomised into two groups: who received either 100ml bolus of 6% HES (n=34) or 100 mL bolus of placebo 0.9% normal saline (n=34). Comparison of demographic characteristics, pain during propofol injection, and adverse effects was done. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Both groups had similar age, gender, ASA, and weight distribution. Compared to Group B, Group A has a statistically comparable propofol dose distribution (Mean &plusmn; SD: 102.79 &plusmn; 31.6 mg vs 103.68 &plusmn; 31.07 mg, p=0.908). In terms of heart rate compared to placebo, HES group had comparable heart rate before induction at 1, 2, 3, and at 4 minutes. SBP, DBP, and respiratory rate were also comparable. Compared to placebo group, HES group showed significant lesser pain at 10 seconds (0.29 &plusmn; 0.58 vs. 1 &plusmn; 0.98, p = 0.001); at 20 seconds (0.18 &plusmn; 0.46 vs. 0.85 &plusmn; 0.89, p = 0.0003); and at 30 seconds (0.12 &plusmn; 0.41 vs. 0.59 &plusmn; 0.66, p = 0.0003). There were no significant adverse effects in any group. Conclusion: It can be concluded that 6% HES is efficacious and safe for controlling pain on propofol injection. It brings about a significant reduction in the pain as assessed by VAS at various time points without causing any significant side effects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21275/mr25920090001
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch Pre-Administration for Reduction of Pain on Propofol Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Valsamma Abraham, Fedry Singh B
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Effect of 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch Pre-Administration for Reduction of Pain on Propofol Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Valsamma Abraham, Fedry Singh B
article en

Abstract

Background: Pain on propofol injection has been a matter of concern over the years. However, even with multi-modal techniques, pain on propofol injection is not abolished completely. Colloids modify the vascular endothelium and prevent contact activation of various substances. Pre administration of colloids may prevent contact activation of vascular endothelium by propofol. Aims and Objectives: To study the effect of 6% HES on the incidence of pain on propofol injection, and occurrence of any adverse reaction. Materials and Methods: This double blinded randomized study included 68 patients of the ASA I and II patients and 18-65 years old who underwent elective surgery. The patients were randomised into two groups: who received either 100ml bolus of 6% HES (n=34) or 100 mL bolus of placebo 0.9% normal saline (n=34). Comparison of demographic characteristics, pain during propofol injection, and adverse effects was done. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Both groups had similar age, gender, ASA, and weight distribution. Compared to Group B, Group A has a statistically comparable propofol dose distribution (Mean &plusmn; SD: 102.79 &plusmn; 31.6 mg vs 103.68 &plusmn; 31.07 mg, p=0.908). In terms of heart rate compared to placebo, HES group had comparable heart rate before induction at 1, 2, 3, and at 4 minutes. SBP, DBP, and respiratory rate were also comparable. Compared to placebo group, HES group showed significant lesser pain at 10 seconds (0.29 &plusmn; 0.58 vs. 1 &plusmn; 0.98, p = 0.001); at 20 seconds (0.18 &plusmn; 0.46 vs. 0.85 &plusmn; 0.89, p = 0.0003); and at 30 seconds (0.12 &plusmn; 0.41 vs. 0.59 &plusmn; 0.66, p = 0.0003). There were no significant adverse effects in any group. Conclusion: It can be concluded that 6% HES is efficacious and safe for controlling pain on propofol injection. It brings about a significant reduction in the pain as assessed by VAS at various time points without causing any significant side effects.

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch Pre-Administration for Reduction of Pain on Propofol Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Valsamma Abraham, Fedry Singh B · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS