Assessing Artificial Intelligence-Powered Responses to Common Patient Questions on Radiofrequency Ablation and Cryoanalgesia for Chronic Pain

<b>Background:</b> Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoanalgesia are minimally invasive procedures used when conservative medical management fails and there are positive diagnostic blocks. Although both radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoanalgesia are straightforward techniques, the increasing workload of physicians is leading to less time available for patient interaction, including addressing questions about indications, feasibility, long-term effectiveness, and potential complications. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, such as ChatGPT, have the potential to reduce physician burden and enhance patient education. <b>Methods</b>: An expert panel compiled thirteen frequently asked questions about RFA and cryoanalgesia, which were subsequently submitted to ChatGPT-4.0. The AI-generated responses were evaluated by 41 participants, including pain physicians, healthcare professionals, and non-healthcare individuals. The Likert scale was used for evaluating the responses, focusing on reliability, accuracy, and comprehensibility using predefined acceptability thresholds. <b>Results</b>: Across all 13 questions, ChatGPT's responses demonstrated high overall reliability, with a mean score of 4.9 ± 0.7. The mean accuracy score was 2.6 ± 0.3, suggesting alignment with evidence-based standards. Comprehensibility was rated at 2.7 ± 0.2 on average. Pre-procedural questions achieved the highest scores, while post-procedural questions posed more challenges for ChatGPT. <b>Conclusions:</b> ChatGPT demonstrated potential as an adjunct tool for patient education on RFA and cryoanalgesia. Improvements in procedural specificity and medical accuracy are needed before routine clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196814
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Artificial Intelligence-Powered Responses to Common Patient Questions on Radiofrequency Ablation and Cryoanalgesia for Chronic Pain

Silvia Natoli, Felice Occhigrossi, Maurizio Marchesini, Emanuele Piraccini et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Pain Management and Treatment
4.38
article

Assessing Artificial Intelligence-Powered Responses to Common Patient Questions on Radiofrequency Ablation and Cryoanalgesia for Chronic Pain

Silvia Natoli, Felice Occhigrossi, Maurizio Marchesini, Emanuele Piraccini, Marco Cascella, Christopher Louis Robinson, Giuliano Lo Bianco, Emanuele Sinagra, Cesare Gregoretti, Andrea Tinnirello, Francesco D’Angelo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoanalgesia are minimally invasive procedures used when conservative medical management fails and there are positive diagnostic blocks. Although both radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoanalgesia are straightforward techniques, the increasing workload of physicians is leading to less time available for patient interaction, including addressing questions about indications, feasibility, long-term effectiveness, and potential complications. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, such as ChatGPT, have the potential to reduce physician burden and enhance patient education. <b>Methods</b>: An expert panel compiled thirteen frequently asked questions about RFA and cryoanalgesia, which were subsequently submitted to ChatGPT-4.0. The AI-generated responses were evaluated by 41 participants, including pain physicians, healthcare professionals, and non-healthcare individuals. The Likert scale was used for evaluating the responses, focusing on reliability, accuracy, and comprehensibility using predefined acceptability thresholds. <b>Results</b>: Across all 13 questions, ChatGPT's responses demonstrated high overall reliability, with a mean score of 4.9 ± 0.7. The mean accuracy score was 2.6 ± 0.3, suggesting alignment with evidence-based standards. Comprehensibility was rated at 2.7 ± 0.2 on average. Pre-procedural questions achieved the highest scores, while post-procedural questions posed more challenges for ChatGPT. <b>Conclusions:</b> ChatGPT demonstrated potential as an adjunct tool for patient education on RFA and cryoanalgesia. Improvements in procedural specificity and medical accuracy are needed before routine clinical implementation.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(19)
University of Salerno (IT), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Pavia (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata (IT), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences (IT), Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio di Cefalù (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo (IT), Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pain Management and Treatment
4.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.