Dosimetric comparison of 3D-conformal radiotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and h-VMAT in left breast radiotherapy under free-breathing and breath-hold conditions

This study investigates the role of the h-VMAT (a hybrid of 3DCRT and VMAT) technique in the Deep Inspirational Breath-Hold (DIBH) method for left-breast irradiation by comparing dosimetric parameters of 3DCRT, VMAT, and h-VMAT plans in free breathing and breath-hold conditions. The study enrolled fourteen left breast cancer patients with nodal involvement. Five sets of plans, namely, 3DCRT, VMAT, and three different dose ratios of h-VMAT, were created in both the DIBH and Free-Breathing (FB) data sets. All plans had similar planning criteria and were compared using Dose-Volume parameters of the target and critical organs. Both h-VMAT and VMAT achieved acceptable PTV parameters compared to 3DCRT. A significant reduction in heart mean dose was observed in the h-VMAT80/20 (p < 0.001) under both DIBH and FB methods and was found to be minimal compared to 3DCRT and VMAT. Similarly, Left Anterior Descending Artery (LAD) dose was also reduced in hybrid. Additionally, the left lung volume receiving 20 Gy and 30 Gy were less in hybrid. We conclude that h-VMAT, along with DIBH, is successful in achieving the best trade-off between heart exposed to high and low doses of radiation compared to 3DCRT and VMAT, respectively, without compromising target coverage for left breast radiotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16665-3
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dosimetric comparison of 3D-conformal radiotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and h-VMAT in left breast radiotherapy under free-breathing and breath-hold conditions

C Shambhavi, Jayapalan Krishnan, Umesh Velu, A Mehta et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
3.77
article

Dosimetric comparison of 3D-conformal radiotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and h-VMAT in left breast radiotherapy under free-breathing and breath-hold conditions

C Shambhavi, Jayapalan Krishnan, Umesh Velu, A Mehta, Jayashree Natarajan, J. Jannet Vennila, Shirley Lewis, Anshul Singh, Jyothi Nagesh, Krishna Sharan, Medhavi Gupta, Sarath S Nair, Kaviya Kathiresan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the role of the h-VMAT (a hybrid of 3DCRT and VMAT) technique in the Deep Inspirational Breath-Hold (DIBH) method for left-breast irradiation by comparing dosimetric parameters of 3DCRT, VMAT, and h-VMAT plans in free breathing and breath-hold conditions. The study enrolled fourteen left breast cancer patients with nodal involvement. Five sets of plans, namely, 3DCRT, VMAT, and three different dose ratios of h-VMAT, were created in both the DIBH and Free-Breathing (FB) data sets. All plans had similar planning criteria and were compared using Dose-Volume parameters of the target and critical organs. Both h-VMAT and VMAT achieved acceptable PTV parameters compared to 3DCRT. A significant reduction in heart mean dose was observed in the h-VMAT80/20 (p < 0.001) under both DIBH and FB methods and was found to be minimal compared to 3DCRT and VMAT. Similarly, Left Anterior Descending Artery (LAD) dose was also reduced in hybrid. Additionally, the left lung volume receiving 20 Gy and 30 Gy were less in hybrid. We conclude that h-VMAT, along with DIBH, is successful in achieving the best trade-off between heart exposed to high and low doses of radiation compared to 3DCRT and VMAT, respectively, without compromising target coverage for left breast radiotherapy.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Nitte University (IN), Yenepoya University (IN), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Lakeshore Hospital (IN), General Hospital Ernakulam (IN), K.S. Hegde Hospital (IN), K S Hegde Medical Academy (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
3.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.