Probing faculty researchers’ competencies: Evidence from a cross-sectional survey in a Philippine University

Understanding the unique challenges and opportunities facing university faculty researchers is essential as it can significantly impact their research abilities and effectiveness. This paper investigated the research competencies of faculty researchers in the context of a Philippine state university using a cross-sectional survey design. The researcher assessed the educational qualifications, research experience, academic rank, field of specialization, and research competencies in practical skills, problem-solving, thinking, communication skills, personal and professional ethics, dissemination skills, and roles and functions as a researcher among the 133 permanent and temporary faculty members using an adopted survey instrument. Findings revealed that while faculty members demonstrated reasonable competency in most research domains, their problem-solving, thinking, and communication skills fell below expectations. Educational qualifications significantly influenced practical skills, while research experience impacted dissemination skills. Findings further revealed a direct relationship between practical skills and academic qualifications. These findings highlight the need for the university to strengthen capacity-building initiatives to enhance faculty members’ research competencies, particularly in problem-solving, thinking, and communication skills, thereby contributing to their professional development and ultimately improving the quality of education the university offers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46223/hcmcoujs.soci.en.15.6.3480.2025
Primary Topic
Higher Education Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probing faculty researchers’ competencies: Evidence from a cross-sectional survey in a Philippine University

Ines Gimota Falcon
HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES
Higher Education Learning Practices
article

Probing faculty researchers’ competencies: Evidence from a cross-sectional survey in a Philippine University

Ines Gimota Falcon
article en

Abstract

Understanding the unique challenges and opportunities facing university faculty researchers is essential as it can significantly impact their research abilities and effectiveness. This paper investigated the research competencies of faculty researchers in the context of a Philippine state university using a cross-sectional survey design. The researcher assessed the educational qualifications, research experience, academic rank, field of specialization, and research competencies in practical skills, problem-solving, thinking, communication skills, personal and professional ethics, dissemination skills, and roles and functions as a researcher among the 133 permanent and temporary faculty members using an adopted survey instrument. Findings revealed that while faculty members demonstrated reasonable competency in most research domains, their problem-solving, thinking, and communication skills fell below expectations. Educational qualifications significantly influenced practical skills, while research experience impacted dissemination skills. Findings further revealed a direct relationship between practical skills and academic qualifications. These findings highlight the need for the university to strengthen capacity-building initiatives to enhance faculty members’ research competencies, particularly in problem-solving, thinking, and communication skills, thereby contributing to their professional development and ultimately improving the quality of education the university offers.

HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES
Southern Leyte State University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Higher Education Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.