Straight from the horse's mouth: Changes in salivary oxytocin, cortisol and behaviour in horses interacting with unfamiliar humans

Human-horse interactions can have positive outcomes for people, but not much is known about their effects on horses. As horses are increasingly used for equine-assisted interactions and many horses interact with unfamiliar humans on a daily basis, there is a need to study how interactions with unfamiliar humans affect horses. Salivary oxytocin and cortisol in combination with behavioural parameters are useful for assessing the effects of human-horse interactions on equine stress and welfare. This study investigated the effects of 10 minutes of standardized, affiliative interactions with two unfamiliar humans on salivary cortisol and oxytocin concentrations in 18 riding school horses related to their behaviour. Interactions were limited between 10:00-15:00 to avoid circadian effects. Pre- and post-interaction saliva samples were taken from the humans and the horses before and immediately after the interactions with an average sample interval of 20.7 ± 0.6 and concentrations were determined through ELISA. Behavioural parameters included standing in voluntary proximity, receiving physical contact, nose touching, sniffing in relation to oxytocin and locomotion, chewing, licking, and head shaking related to cortisol. In humans, descriptive statistics indicated that the salivary oxytocin and cortisol concentrations were similar pre- and post interaction. In horses, a linear mixed model showed no significant differences in salivary oxytocin and cortisol concentrations when comparing pre- and post-interaction samples. Salivary oxytocin in horses was not significantly affected by voluntary proximity, receiving physical contact, nose touching, sniffing. Salivary cortisol in horses was negatively affected by headshaking and tended to be positively affected by lip licking. These results do not indicate that affiliative interactions with unfamiliar humans negatively affect stress and eventually welfare in horses, in this particular population under the context studied. • We investigated salivary oxytocin and cortisol during human-horse interactions • Horse oxytocin and cortisol was not affected by interactions with unfamiliar humans • Lip licking related positively to salivary cortisol, suggesting a link to stress • No evidence found that unfamiliar human interaction benefits riding school horses

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106826
Primary Topic
Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Straight from the horse's mouth: Changes in salivary oxytocin, cortisol and behaviour in horses interacting with unfamiliar humans

T.B. Rodenburg, Nienke Endenburg, Jean‐Loup Rault, Claudia M. Vinke et al.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
article

Straight from the horse's mouth: Changes in salivary oxytocin, cortisol and behaviour in horses interacting with unfamiliar humans

T.B. Rodenburg, Nienke Endenburg, Jean‐Loup Rault, Claudia M. Vinke, Hein van Lith, C.M. Kapteijn
article en

Abstract

Human-horse interactions can have positive outcomes for people, but not much is known about their effects on horses. As horses are increasingly used for equine-assisted interactions and many horses interact with unfamiliar humans on a daily basis, there is a need to study how interactions with unfamiliar humans affect horses. Salivary oxytocin and cortisol in combination with behavioural parameters are useful for assessing the effects of human-horse interactions on equine stress and welfare. This study investigated the effects of 10 minutes of standardized, affiliative interactions with two unfamiliar humans on salivary cortisol and oxytocin concentrations in 18 riding school horses related to their behaviour. Interactions were limited between 10:00-15:00 to avoid circadian effects. Pre- and post-interaction saliva samples were taken from the humans and the horses before and immediately after the interactions with an average sample interval of 20.7 ± 0.6 and concentrations were determined through ELISA. Behavioural parameters included standing in voluntary proximity, receiving physical contact, nose touching, sniffing in relation to oxytocin and locomotion, chewing, licking, and head shaking related to cortisol. In humans, descriptive statistics indicated that the salivary oxytocin and cortisol concentrations were similar pre- and post interaction. In horses, a linear mixed model showed no significant differences in salivary oxytocin and cortisol concentrations when comparing pre- and post-interaction samples. Salivary oxytocin in horses was not significantly affected by voluntary proximity, receiving physical contact, nose touching, sniffing. Salivary cortisol in horses was negatively affected by headshaking and tended to be positively affected by lip licking. These results do not indicate that affiliative interactions with unfamiliar humans negatively affect stress and eventually welfare in horses, in this particular population under the context studied. • We investigated salivary oxytocin and cortisol during human-horse interactions • Horse oxytocin and cortisol was not affected by interactions with unfamiliar humans • Lip licking related positively to salivary cortisol, suggesting a link to stress • No evidence found that unfamiliar human interaction benefits riding school horses

Applied Animal Behaviour ScienceVol. 292
Animal Welfare Institute (US), University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT), Utrecht University (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.