Qualitative and quantitative methods in the field of semantics

Abstract This paper shows that the combination of qualitative and (basic) quantitative methods is a fruitful approach in the case of a semantic analysis of comparable and parallel corpus data. This point is illustrated through a comparison of two close French dynamic prepositions with a medial polarity, i.e. à travers and au travers de ‘across, through, by means of’ (often considered to be synonyms) with their intuitive equivalent in Dutch, door ‘through, by’. The study relies on corpus data stemming from the Dutch Parallel Corpus 2.0. The results offer new insights (i.e. an important difference in distribution of concrete and abstract uses in French and Dutch) and contradict some existing (lexicographic) descriptions and intuitions, viz. a nonexistent mutual correspondence between au travers de and door , and an unexpected preference for Dutch via as equivalent for French à travers in abstract configurations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nota Bene
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/nb.00027.hoe
Primary Topic
linguistics and terminology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Qualitative and quantitative methods in the field of semantics

Thomas Hoelbeek
Nota Bene
linguistics and terminology studies
article

Qualitative and quantitative methods in the field of semantics

Thomas Hoelbeek
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper shows that the combination of qualitative and (basic) quantitative methods is a fruitful approach in the case of a semantic analysis of comparable and parallel corpus data. This point is illustrated through a comparison of two close French dynamic prepositions with a medial polarity, i.e. à travers and au travers de ‘across, through, by means of’ (often considered to be synonyms) with their intuitive equivalent in Dutch, door ‘through, by’. The study relies on corpus data stemming from the Dutch Parallel Corpus 2.0. The results offer new insights (i.e. an important difference in distribution of concrete and abstract uses in French and Dutch) and contradict some existing (lexicographic) descriptions and intuitions, viz. a nonexistent mutual correspondence between au travers de and door , and an unexpected preference for Dutch via as equivalent for French à travers in abstract configurations.

Nota BeneVol. 2(1)
University of Klagenfurt (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
linguistics and terminology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.