CuBE: A Customizable Bounds Evaluation Framework for Automated Assessment of RAG Systems in Government Services

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are increasingly adopted in government services, yet different administrations have varying customization needs and lack standardized methods to evaluate performance. In particular, general-purpose evaluation approaches fail to show how well a system meets domain-specific expectations. This paper presents CuBE (Customizable Bounds Evaluation), a tailored evaluation framework for RAG systems in public administration. CuBE integrates large language model (LLM) scoring, customizable evaluation dimensions, and a bounded scoring paradigm with baseline and upper-bound reference sets, enhancing fairness, consistency, and interpretability. We further introduce Lightweight Targeted Assessment (LTA) to support efficient customization. CuBE is validated on GSIA (Guizhou Provincial Government Service Center Intelligent Assistant) by using four state-of-the-art language models. The results show that CuBE produces robust, stable, and model-agnostic evaluations while reducing reliance on manual annotation and facilitating system optimization and rapid iteration. Moreover, CuBE informs parameter settings, enabling developers to design RAG systems that better meet customizer needs. This study establishes a replicable paradigm for trustworthy and efficient evaluation of RAG systems in complex government service scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910447
Primary Topic
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CuBE: A Customizable Bounds Evaluation Framework for Automated Assessment of RAG Systems in Government Services

Xin Zheng, Xinmin Dai, Xuhong Yu, Xiaoyao Xie et al.
Applied Sciences
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
article

CuBE: A Customizable Bounds Evaluation Framework for Automated Assessment of RAG Systems in Government Services

Xin Zheng, Xinmin Dai, Xuhong Yu, Xiaoyao Xie, Zhentao Liu, Binglan Yang, Jing Nong
article en

Abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are increasingly adopted in government services, yet different administrations have varying customization needs and lack standardized methods to evaluate performance. In particular, general-purpose evaluation approaches fail to show how well a system meets domain-specific expectations. This paper presents CuBE (Customizable Bounds Evaluation), a tailored evaluation framework for RAG systems in public administration. CuBE integrates large language model (LLM) scoring, customizable evaluation dimensions, and a bounded scoring paradigm with baseline and upper-bound reference sets, enhancing fairness, consistency, and interpretability. We further introduce Lightweight Targeted Assessment (LTA) to support efficient customization. CuBE is validated on GSIA (Guizhou Provincial Government Service Center Intelligent Assistant) by using four state-of-the-art language models. The results show that CuBE produces robust, stable, and model-agnostic evaluations while reducing reliance on manual annotation and facilitating system optimization and rapid iteration. Moreover, CuBE informs parameter settings, enabling developers to design RAG systems that better meet customizer needs. This study establishes a replicable paradigm for trustworthy and efficient evaluation of RAG systems in complex government service scenarios.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(19)
Guizhou Normal University (CN), Guizhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.