Comparing the performance of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude in English and Polish on medical examinations

In the realm of medical education, the utility of chatbots is being explored with growing interest. One pertinent area of investigation is the performance of these models on standardized medical examinations, which are crucial for certifying the knowledge and readiness of healthcare professionals. In Poland, dental and medical students have to pass crucial exams known as LDEK (Medical-Dental Final Examination) and LEK (Medical Final Examination) exams respectively. The primary objective of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of chatbots: ChatGPT-4, Gemini and Claude to evaluate their accuracy in answering exam questions of the LDEK and the Medical-Dental Verification Examination (LDEW), using queries in both English and Polish. The analysis of Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Model, which compared chatbots within question groups, showed that the chatbot Claude achieved the highest probability of accuracy for all question groups except the area of prosthetic dentistry compared to ChatGPT-4 and Gemini. In addition, the probability of a correct answer to questions in the field of integrated medicine was higher than in the field of dentistry for all chatbots in both prompt languages. Our results demonstrated that Claude achieved the highest accuracy in all areas analysed and outperformed other chatbots. This suggests that Claude has significant potential to support the medical education of dental students. This study showed that the performance of chatbots varied depending on the prompt language and the specific field. This highlights the importance of considering language and specialty when selecting a chatbot for educational purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17030-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the performance of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude in English and Polish on medical examinations

Leszek Szalewski, Dorota Wójcik, Oskar Tokarczuk, Ola Adamiak et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Comparing the performance of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude in English and Polish on medical examinations

Leszek Szalewski, Dorota Wójcik, Oskar Tokarczuk, Ola Adamiak, Gabriela Czerepak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the realm of medical education, the utility of chatbots is being explored with growing interest. One pertinent area of investigation is the performance of these models on standardized medical examinations, which are crucial for certifying the knowledge and readiness of healthcare professionals. In Poland, dental and medical students have to pass crucial exams known as LDEK (Medical-Dental Final Examination) and LEK (Medical Final Examination) exams respectively. The primary objective of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of chatbots: ChatGPT-4, Gemini and Claude to evaluate their accuracy in answering exam questions of the LDEK and the Medical-Dental Verification Examination (LDEW), using queries in both English and Polish. The analysis of Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Model, which compared chatbots within question groups, showed that the chatbot Claude achieved the highest probability of accuracy for all question groups except the area of prosthetic dentistry compared to ChatGPT-4 and Gemini. In addition, the probability of a correct answer to questions in the field of integrated medicine was higher than in the field of dentistry for all chatbots in both prompt languages. Our results demonstrated that Claude achieved the highest accuracy in all areas analysed and outperformed other chatbots. This suggests that Claude has significant potential to support the medical education of dental students. This study showed that the performance of chatbots varied depending on the prompt language and the specific field. This highlights the importance of considering language and specialty when selecting a chatbot for educational purposes.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Medical University of Lublin (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing the performance of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude in English and Polish on medical examinations — Leszek Szalewski, Dorota Wójcik, et al. · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS