Effects of Jogging with a Hydration Pack on Ground Reaction Forces

Background/Objectives: Long-distance running often requires athletes to carry their own hydration. Both the velocity of the runner and the load will affect the ground reaction forces (GRFs). Furthermore, carrying a liquid mass may have different outcomes on GRF compared to carrying a solid mass. This effect may in turn potentially result in a greater risk of injury. The goal of this study was to examine the GRF while jogging with different quantities of water in a hydration pack. It was expected that GRF measures would change with increased hydration pack weight. Methods: Twenty college-aged participants were asked to run over a force plate with an empty hydration pack and packs (0.71 kg) filled with 0.5 litres (1.21 kg), 1.5 litres (1.71 kg), and 2.5 litres (3.21 kg) of water. Results: No significant differences (p > 0.05) in the vertical, lateral, or forward–back measures were found between the different loads. These outcomes may be a result of the dampening effect the movement of the water may have on gait. Conclusions: It is believed that the benefit of having hydration readily available via a hydration pack will outweigh any potential for injury due to the added weight being carried.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomechanics
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics5040073
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Jogging with a Hydration Pack on Ground Reaction Forces

Jordan L. Cola, Jason Wicke, Hannah Panzarella
Biomechanics
Occupational Health and Performance
article

Effects of Jogging with a Hydration Pack on Ground Reaction Forces

Jordan L. Cola, Jason Wicke, Hannah Panzarella
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Long-distance running often requires athletes to carry their own hydration. Both the velocity of the runner and the load will affect the ground reaction forces (GRFs). Furthermore, carrying a liquid mass may have different outcomes on GRF compared to carrying a solid mass. This effect may in turn potentially result in a greater risk of injury. The goal of this study was to examine the GRF while jogging with different quantities of water in a hydration pack. It was expected that GRF measures would change with increased hydration pack weight. Methods: Twenty college-aged participants were asked to run over a force plate with an empty hydration pack and packs (0.71 kg) filled with 0.5 litres (1.21 kg), 1.5 litres (1.71 kg), and 2.5 litres (3.21 kg) of water. Results: No significant differences (p > 0.05) in the vertical, lateral, or forward–back measures were found between the different loads. These outcomes may be a result of the dampening effect the movement of the water may have on gait. Conclusions: It is believed that the benefit of having hydration readily available via a hydration pack will outweigh any potential for injury due to the added weight being carried.

BiomechanicsVol. 5(4)
William Paterson University (US), Felician University (US)
William Paterson University of New Jersey
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.