Frequency issues in multimodal Construction Grammar revisited

Abstract After more than a decade of constructionist research on multimodal phenomena, it is still not clear if and how para- and non-verbal layers should be integrated in Construction Grammar. One major issue is the frequency of co-occurrence of the different modes of expression: even though it is increasingly accepted in Construction Grammar that frequency is hard to operationalize as a criterion for construction status, especially opponents of multimodal approaches use low co-occurrence rates as an argument against the idea of a multimodal construction. But proponents of multimodal Construction Grammar who do not see frequency as decisive also tend to reduce frequency to mere numbers, without paying sufficient attention to all the factors that may influence frequency values. The aim of this paper is to draw attention to the problem and to show that it is even more important in multimodal than in unimodal Construction Grammar to interpret frequency rates in the context of the data that are used for the analysis, focusing especially on external factors that influence gesturing and on the issue of the appropriate degree of abstraction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nota Bene
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/nb.00028.sch
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frequency issues in multimodal Construction Grammar revisited

Steven Schoonjans, Beatrix Schönherr
Nota Bene
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Frequency issues in multimodal Construction Grammar revisited

Steven Schoonjans, Beatrix Schönherr
article en

Abstract

Abstract After more than a decade of constructionist research on multimodal phenomena, it is still not clear if and how para- and non-verbal layers should be integrated in Construction Grammar. One major issue is the frequency of co-occurrence of the different modes of expression: even though it is increasingly accepted in Construction Grammar that frequency is hard to operationalize as a criterion for construction status, especially opponents of multimodal approaches use low co-occurrence rates as an argument against the idea of a multimodal construction. But proponents of multimodal Construction Grammar who do not see frequency as decisive also tend to reduce frequency to mere numbers, without paying sufficient attention to all the factors that may influence frequency values. The aim of this paper is to draw attention to the problem and to show that it is even more important in multimodal than in unimodal Construction Grammar to interpret frequency rates in the context of the data that are used for the analysis, focusing especially on external factors that influence gesturing and on the issue of the appropriate degree of abstraction.

Nota BeneVol. 2(1)
Leibniz Institute for the German Language (DE), University of Klagenfurt (AT), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Frequency issues in multimodal Construction Grammar revisited — Steven Schoonjans, Beatrix Schönherr · Nota Bene (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS