AI Literacy Among University Students and Faculty: Similarities and Differences

This study assessed AI literacy levels among 111 respondents at Centro Escolar University using a four-dimensional framework (Kong, 2024). Despite widespread AI adoption (99.1%), only 5.4% received formal training, revealing a critical educational gap. Faculty demonstrated significantly higher literacy in metacognitive (p = 0.02), affective (p < 0.01), and social dimensions (p < 0.01) compared to students. Both groups showed similar cognitive understanding and tool usage patterns. The research aligns with UN Sustainable Development Goals 4 (Quality Education) and 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) by identifying barriers to equitable AI education. Findings indicate urgent need for structured AI literacy programs, ethical curriculum integration, and institutional policy development to prepare students for an AI-driven workforce. This study contributes to understanding AI literacy disparities in higher education and provides evidence-based recommendations for comprehensive educational reform supporting sustainable development objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.09.33
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Literacy Among University Students and Faculty: Similarities and Differences

Josan D. Tamayo, Eliza B. Ayo, Dan Erico Asur
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research
Online Learning and Analytics
article

AI Literacy Among University Students and Faculty: Similarities and Differences

Josan D. Tamayo, Eliza B. Ayo, Dan Erico Asur
article en

Abstract

This study assessed AI literacy levels among 111 respondents at Centro Escolar University using a four-dimensional framework (Kong, 2024). Despite widespread AI adoption (99.1%), only 5.4% received formal training, revealing a critical educational gap. Faculty demonstrated significantly higher literacy in metacognitive (p = 0.02), affective (p < 0.01), and social dimensions (p < 0.01) compared to students. Both groups showed similar cognitive understanding and tool usage patterns. The research aligns with UN Sustainable Development Goals 4 (Quality Education) and 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) by identifying barriers to equitable AI education. Findings indicate urgent need for structured AI literacy programs, ethical curriculum integration, and institutional policy development to prepare students for an AI-driven workforce. This study contributes to understanding AI literacy disparities in higher education and provides evidence-based recommendations for comprehensive educational reform supporting sustainable development objectives.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education ResearchVol. 6(9)
Centro Escolar University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI Literacy Among University Students and Faculty: Similarities and Differences — Josan D. Tamayo, Eliza B. Ayo, et al. · International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS