Sensitivity Analysis in Simple Cycles for Hydrogen Liquefaction

Due to the increase in global energy demand, as well as environmental concerns, hydrogen presents itself as a promising energy source. Liquid hydrogen is more suited for long-distance transportation, but hydrogen liquefaction is an energy-intensive process, and many studies have been published proposing more efficient liquefaction cycles. In this study, simple hydrogen liquefaction cycles like Claude, pre-cooled Linde–Hampson (PLH), single mixed refrigerant (SMR), and dual mixed refrigerant (DMR) were assessed regarding the influence of the cycle’s high pressure on energy efficiency, exergy destruction, and its distribution along the equipment. Among the main results, Claude presented the best specific energy consumption (SEC) of 16.47 kWh/kgLH, followed by DMR with an SEC of 17.30 kWh/kgLH, SMR with 17.58 kWh/kgLH, and finally PLH, with an SEC of 45.07 kWh/kgLH. The exergy efficiency followed the same pattern as the SEC, with Claude having the lowest exergy destruction, followed by DMR and SMR with close exergy destruction, and finally PLH. Nonetheless, although cycles were not optimized in evaluating the effect of increasing the high pressure, which constrains the direct applicability of the result found, especially in the pre-cooled cycles, the analysis provides valuable insights into the sensitivity of cycle performance. The method and its findings provide the basis for further studies, including optimization steps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13103076
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity Analysis in Simple Cycles for Hydrogen Liquefaction

Caliane Bastos Borba Costa, Kevin Mitsuhiro Omori, José A. Caballero, Mauro A.S.S. Ravagnani et al.
Processes
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
article

Sensitivity Analysis in Simple Cycles for Hydrogen Liquefaction

Caliane Bastos Borba Costa, Kevin Mitsuhiro Omori, José A. Caballero, Mauro A.S.S. Ravagnani, Leandro V. Pavão, María J. Fernández‐Torres, Ramón Mazon-Cartagena
article en

Abstract

Due to the increase in global energy demand, as well as environmental concerns, hydrogen presents itself as a promising energy source. Liquid hydrogen is more suited for long-distance transportation, but hydrogen liquefaction is an energy-intensive process, and many studies have been published proposing more efficient liquefaction cycles. In this study, simple hydrogen liquefaction cycles like Claude, pre-cooled Linde–Hampson (PLH), single mixed refrigerant (SMR), and dual mixed refrigerant (DMR) were assessed regarding the influence of the cycle’s high pressure on energy efficiency, exergy destruction, and its distribution along the equipment. Among the main results, Claude presented the best specific energy consumption (SEC) of 16.47 kWh/kgLH, followed by DMR with an SEC of 17.30 kWh/kgLH, SMR with 17.58 kWh/kgLH, and finally PLH, with an SEC of 45.07 kWh/kgLH. The exergy efficiency followed the same pattern as the SEC, with Claude having the lowest exergy destruction, followed by DMR and SMR with close exergy destruction, and finally PLH. Nonetheless, although cycles were not optimized in evaluating the effect of increasing the high pressure, which constrains the direct applicability of the result found, especially in the pre-cooled cycles, the analysis provides valuable insights into the sensitivity of cycle performance. The method and its findings provide the basis for further studies, including optimization steps.

ProcessesVol. 13(10)
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR), University of Alicante (ES)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.