‘ChatGPT can make mistakes’ warnings fail: A randomized controlled trial
The students underweight AI's diagnostic advice. The disclaimer did not alter students' use of AI advice, suggesting that their perceived credibility of ChatGPT was already near a behavioural floor. This finding supports the existence of a credibility threshold, beyond which additional cautionary cues have limited effect. Our results refine advice-taking theory and signal that simple warnings may be insufficient to ensure calibrated trust in AI-supported learning.
Authors
- Yavuz Selim Kıyak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5026-3234)
- Işıl İrem Budakoğlu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1517-3169)
- Özlem Çoşkun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8716-1584)
Institutions
- Gazi University (TR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Medical Education
- Published
- 2025-09-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.70056
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.03