A Sustainability Evaluation of Large-Scale Water Network Projects: A Case Study of the Jiaodong Water Network Project, China

Large-scale water network projects are a crucial approach for the rational allocation of water resources and addressing water resource crises. Reliable sustainability evaluation is essential to ensure the sustainable operation of large-scale water network projects. This study develops an improved Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation (FCE) method based on Game Theory weight fusion (GWF) for the quantitative evaluation of the sustainability of water network projects. By combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Entropy Weight Method (EWM), and Game Theory approach, the study integrates the advantages of both subjective and objective weighting methods to achieve the allocation of indicator weights; the sustainability of the Jiaodong Water Network Project was quantitatively evaluated by employing the improved FCE method. The results indicate that the resource and management dimensions are the two most critical factors affecting the sustainability of large-scale water network projects. Indicators with high weight such as per capita water resources, the rationality of the management system, and level of management intelligence are the primary risk factors affecting the sustainable operation of large-scale water network projects. The sustainability evaluation value of the Jiaodong Water Network Project is 82.83 points, which is classified as “high” sustainability. This validates the reliability of the evaluation indicator system and the method used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17192822
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Sustainability Evaluation of Large-Scale Water Network Projects: A Case Study of the Jiaodong Water Network Project, China

Yue Qiu, Changshun Liu
Water
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
article

A Sustainability Evaluation of Large-Scale Water Network Projects: A Case Study of the Jiaodong Water Network Project, China

Yue Qiu, Changshun Liu
article en

Abstract

Large-scale water network projects are a crucial approach for the rational allocation of water resources and addressing water resource crises. Reliable sustainability evaluation is essential to ensure the sustainable operation of large-scale water network projects. This study develops an improved Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation (FCE) method based on Game Theory weight fusion (GWF) for the quantitative evaluation of the sustainability of water network projects. By combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Entropy Weight Method (EWM), and Game Theory approach, the study integrates the advantages of both subjective and objective weighting methods to achieve the allocation of indicator weights; the sustainability of the Jiaodong Water Network Project was quantitatively evaluated by employing the improved FCE method. The results indicate that the resource and management dimensions are the two most critical factors affecting the sustainability of large-scale water network projects. Indicators with high weight such as per capita water resources, the rationality of the management system, and level of management intelligence are the primary risk factors affecting the sustainable operation of large-scale water network projects. The sustainability evaluation value of the Jiaodong Water Network Project is 82.83 points, which is classified as “high” sustainability. This validates the reliability of the evaluation indicator system and the method used.

WaterVol. 17(19)
China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN), Beijing Institute of Water (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.