Addressing social risks of older people with care needs: how European welfare states combine pension and long-term care policies

Abstract Older people with long-term care (LTC) needs represent a growing and vulnerable group in European societies. A focus on the interrelation between pension and LTC policies can be useful in determining the extent to which European welfare states address this group’s social risks. This paper asks how European welfare states differ in the extent to which their institutional constellations of pension and LTC policies address older people’s social risks. We systematically measure the generosity of both policy fields at the institutional level to investigate cross-national differences in five European countries representing different welfare regime types. Furthermore, we develop a typology with four types of institutional constellations: residual, pension-oriented supplementary, LTC-oriented supplementary, and complementary. Our empirical results show that the studied welfare states differ in their pension and LTC policy constellations, which has different consequences for the coverage of older people’s social risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Policy
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279425101189
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing social risks of older people with care needs: how European welfare states combine pension and long-term care policies

Thurid Eggers, Christopher Grages, Julia Höppner
Journal of Social Policy
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Addressing social risks of older people with care needs: how European welfare states combine pension and long-term care policies

Thurid Eggers, Christopher Grages, Julia Höppner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Older people with long-term care (LTC) needs represent a growing and vulnerable group in European societies. A focus on the interrelation between pension and LTC policies can be useful in determining the extent to which European welfare states address this group’s social risks. This paper asks how European welfare states differ in the extent to which their institutional constellations of pension and LTC policies address older people’s social risks. We systematically measure the generosity of both policy fields at the institutional level to investigate cross-national differences in five European countries representing different welfare regime types. Furthermore, we develop a typology with four types of institutional constellations: residual, pension-oriented supplementary, LTC-oriented supplementary, and complementary. Our empirical results show that the studied welfare states differ in their pension and LTC policy constellations, which has different consequences for the coverage of older people’s social risks.

Journal of Social Policy
University of Kassel (DE), University of Bremen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Addressing social risks of older people with care needs: how European welfare states combine pension and long-term care policies — Thurid Eggers, Christopher Grages, et al. · Journal of Social Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS