MPC Design and Comparative Analysis of Single-Phase 7-Level PUC and 9-Level CSC Inverters for Grid Integration of PV Panels

In this study, a novel comparison between single phase 7-Level Packed U—Cell (PUC) inverter and single phase 9-Level Cross Switches Cell (CSC) inverter with Model Predictive Controller (MPC) for solar grid-tied applications is presented. Our innovation introduces a unique approach by integrating PV solar panels in PUC and CSC inverters in their two DC links rather than just one which increases power density of the system. Another key benefit for the proposed models lies in their simplified design, offering improved power quality and reduced complexity relative to traditional configurations. Moreover, both models feature streamlined control architectures that eliminate the need for additional controllers such as PI controllers for grid reference current extraction. Furthermore, the implementation of Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) technology directly optimizes power output from the PV panels, negating the necessity for a DC-DC booster converter during integration. To validate the proposed concept’s performance for both inverters, extensive simulations were conducted using MATLAB/Simulink, assessing both inverters under steady-state conditions as well as various disturbances to evaluate its robustness and dynamic response. Both inverters exhibit robustness against variations in grid voltage, phase shift, and irradiation. By comparing both inverters, results demonstrate that the CSC inverter exhibits superior performance due to its booster feature which relies on generating voltage level greater than the DC input source. This primary advantage makes CSC a booster inverter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195116
Primary Topic
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MPC Design and Comparative Analysis of Single-Phase 7-Level PUC and 9-Level CSC Inverters for Grid Integration of PV Panels

Raghda Hariri, Hadi Y. Kanaan, Kamal Al‐Haddad, Fadia Sebaaly
Energies
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
article

MPC Design and Comparative Analysis of Single-Phase 7-Level PUC and 9-Level CSC Inverters for Grid Integration of PV Panels

Raghda Hariri, Hadi Y. Kanaan, Kamal Al‐Haddad, Fadia Sebaaly
article en

Abstract

In this study, a novel comparison between single phase 7-Level Packed U—Cell (PUC) inverter and single phase 9-Level Cross Switches Cell (CSC) inverter with Model Predictive Controller (MPC) for solar grid-tied applications is presented. Our innovation introduces a unique approach by integrating PV solar panels in PUC and CSC inverters in their two DC links rather than just one which increases power density of the system. Another key benefit for the proposed models lies in their simplified design, offering improved power quality and reduced complexity relative to traditional configurations. Moreover, both models feature streamlined control architectures that eliminate the need for additional controllers such as PI controllers for grid reference current extraction. Furthermore, the implementation of Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) technology directly optimizes power output from the PV panels, negating the necessity for a DC-DC booster converter during integration. To validate the proposed concept’s performance for both inverters, extensive simulations were conducted using MATLAB/Simulink, assessing both inverters under steady-state conditions as well as various disturbances to evaluate its robustness and dynamic response. Both inverters exhibit robustness against variations in grid voltage, phase shift, and irradiation. By comparing both inverters, results demonstrate that the CSC inverter exhibits superior performance due to its booster feature which relies on generating voltage level greater than the DC input source. This primary advantage makes CSC a booster inverter.

EnergiesVol. 18(19)
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Saint Joseph University (LB), Hydro-Québec (CA), École de Technologie Supérieure (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Multilevel Inverters and Converters
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.