Clinical Outcomes of Different Generation <scp>EGFR TKIs</scp> in Susceptible <scp>EGFR</scp> ‐Mutated Advanced Nonsmall‐Cell Lung Cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are indicated for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring susceptible EGFR mutations. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the effectiveness of different generations of EGFR TKIs. We enrolled 421 patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and sensitizing EGFR mutations receiving an EGFR-TKI as their first-line therapy, including first-generation (1st G, gefitinib and erlotinib), second-generation (2nd G, afatinib), and third-generation (3rd G, osimertinib) EGFR TKIs. The median progression free survival (PFS) (12.10 vs. 16.67 months vs. not reached; p = 0.0002) and overall survival (OS) (31.23 vs. 45.97 months vs. not reached; p = 0.0215) were significantly different between different generations of EGFR TKIs. 3rd G EGFR TKI provided the best PFS, particularly in patients with exon 19 deletion. The patients receiving 1st G EGFR TKIs (p = 0.005), with exon 19 deletion (p = 0.001) and PFS ≥ 270 days (p = 0.012) had a significantly higher T790M mutation rate. There was no survival difference between the patients receiving frontline 3rd G EGFR TKI and those receiving 3rd G EGFR TKI as sequential therapy (median OS 46.60 months vs. not reached, p = 0.1941). The OS of the patients who did not receive 3rd G EGFR TKI as sequential therapy was significantly worse than those receiving 3rd G EGFR TKI as first-line therapy (median OS 22.47 months vs. not reached, p = 0.0042). In conclusion, 3rd G EGFR TKI may provide better survival benefits as first-line therapy for patients harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations, particularly those with exon 19 deletion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.70105
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcomes of Different Generation EGFR TKIs in Susceptible EGFR ‐Mutated Advanced Nonsmall‐Cell Lung Cancer

Jui‐Ying Lee, Cheng‐Hao Chuang, Inn‐Wen Chong, Tien‐Chi Huang et al.
The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Clinical Outcomes of Different Generation EGFR TKIs in Susceptible EGFR ‐Mutated Advanced Nonsmall‐Cell Lung Cancer

Jui‐Ying Lee, Cheng‐Hao Chuang, Inn‐Wen Chong, Tien‐Chi Huang, Kuan‐Li Wu, Mei–Hsuan Lee, Chia‐Yu Kuo, Jen‐Yu Hung, Ying‐Ming Tsai
article en

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are indicated for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring susceptible EGFR mutations. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the effectiveness of different generations of EGFR TKIs. We enrolled 421 patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma and sensitizing EGFR mutations receiving an EGFR-TKI as their first-line therapy, including first-generation (1st G, gefitinib and erlotinib), second-generation (2nd G, afatinib), and third-generation (3rd G, osimertinib) EGFR TKIs. The median progression free survival (PFS) (12.10 vs. 16.67 months vs. not reached; p = 0.0002) and overall survival (OS) (31.23 vs. 45.97 months vs. not reached; p = 0.0215) were significantly different between different generations of EGFR TKIs. 3rd G EGFR TKI provided the best PFS, particularly in patients with exon 19 deletion. The patients receiving 1st G EGFR TKIs (p = 0.005), with exon 19 deletion (p = 0.001) and PFS ≥ 270 days (p = 0.012) had a significantly higher T790M mutation rate. There was no survival difference between the patients receiving frontline 3rd G EGFR TKI and those receiving 3rd G EGFR TKI as sequential therapy (median OS 46.60 months vs. not reached, p = 0.1941). The OS of the patients who did not receive 3rd G EGFR TKI as sequential therapy was significantly worse than those receiving 3rd G EGFR TKI as first-line therapy (median OS 22.47 months vs. not reached, p = 0.0042). In conclusion, 3rd G EGFR TKI may provide better survival benefits as first-line therapy for patients harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations, particularly those with exon 19 deletion.

The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 42(3)
Kaohsiung Medical University (TW), Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital (TW), Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital (TW)
Clinical Trial Center, China Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.