A global census of weed risk assessment standards

Abstract Weed Risk Assessments (WRAs) aim to distinguish potentially invasive plants from non-invasive plants using traits such as the likelihood that the species will be introduced, establish, spread, and/or have negative impacts and (sometimes) whether it can be managed effectively. International standards for the criteria used to assess risk have been proposed to improve the sharing and transferability of WRA results. However, it is unclear whether existing WRAs follow these standards. Here, we compiled a global database of national-level and subnational-level (state/province) WRAs and evaluated their assessment criteria relative to an amended list of proposed minimum standards. We searched for WRAs in 240 countries and retrieved 20 unique assessments associated with 81 countries. The most comprehensive WRA was the “Guidelines for the Generic Ecological Impact Assessment of Alien Species” created by Norway, which satisfied 23 of 24 standards. The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) Pest Risk Analysis Framework and the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) Express Pest Risk Analysis were also comprehensive, fulfilling 21 of 24 standards. All national-level WRAs included a description of the focal species’ taxonomy, a description of risk assessment area, an assessment of the likelihood of spread of the focal species, and an assessment of the likelihood of impact of the focal species. Conversely, it was rare for WRAs to include a history of spread of the focal species or an evaluation of the possible effects of climate change. States/provinces showed a similar pattern (i.e., rarely discussed climate change), but also frequently lacked assessment of impact on ecosystem services and metrics of uncertainty. Many WRAs are shared between countries, but few are shared between states/provinces. Adopting similar WRA standards would allow policymakers and governing bodies to more effectively share information and results from completed WRAs, improving consistency of regulated plants across jurisdictional borders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Invasive Plant Science and Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2025.10030
Primary Topic
Biological Control of Invasive Species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A global census of weed risk assessment standards

Bethany A. Bradley, Charles G. Chimera, T. Smith, William G. Pfadenhauer et al.
Invasive Plant Science and Management
Biological Control of Invasive Species
article

A global census of weed risk assessment standards

Bethany A. Bradley, Charles G. Chimera, T. Smith, William G. Pfadenhauer, Justin D. Salva, Benjamin Kesler, Luca Pillidge
article en

Abstract

Abstract Weed Risk Assessments (WRAs) aim to distinguish potentially invasive plants from non-invasive plants using traits such as the likelihood that the species will be introduced, establish, spread, and/or have negative impacts and (sometimes) whether it can be managed effectively. International standards for the criteria used to assess risk have been proposed to improve the sharing and transferability of WRA results. However, it is unclear whether existing WRAs follow these standards. Here, we compiled a global database of national-level and subnational-level (state/province) WRAs and evaluated their assessment criteria relative to an amended list of proposed minimum standards. We searched for WRAs in 240 countries and retrieved 20 unique assessments associated with 81 countries. The most comprehensive WRA was the “Guidelines for the Generic Ecological Impact Assessment of Alien Species” created by Norway, which satisfied 23 of 24 standards. The International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) Pest Risk Analysis Framework and the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) Express Pest Risk Analysis were also comprehensive, fulfilling 21 of 24 standards. All national-level WRAs included a description of the focal species’ taxonomy, a description of risk assessment area, an assessment of the likelihood of spread of the focal species, and an assessment of the likelihood of impact of the focal species. Conversely, it was rare for WRAs to include a history of spread of the focal species or an evaluation of the possible effects of climate change. States/provinces showed a similar pattern (i.e., rarely discussed climate change), but also frequently lacked assessment of impact on ecosystem services and metrics of uncertainty. Many WRAs are shared between countries, but few are shared between states/provinces. Adopting similar WRA standards would allow policymakers and governing bodies to more effectively share information and results from completed WRAs, improving consistency of regulated plants across jurisdictional borders.

Invasive Plant Science and ManagementVol. 18
University of Hawaii System (US), Amherst College (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Centre for Invasive Species Solution (AU)
U.S. Geological Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Biological Control of Invasive Species
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.