DAO as Rhizome: Reimagining Rules, Governance and Organisations

Abstract Blockchain’s disruptive potential finds a compelling expression in decentralised autonomous organisations (DAOs), which deploy smart contracts to automate core functions and displace traditional forms of governance. This paper offers a critical interrogation of the DAO phenomenon, examining capacity of DAOs to reconfigure organisational structures and challenge entrenched paradigms of human cooperation. Drawing on Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s concept of the rhizome, a dynamic and non-hierarchical network that fosters continuous growth and transformation, it explores how DAOs embody rhizomatic principles through token-based membership, decentralised governance, and global interconnectivity. Yet even if DAOs gesture towards radical democratic possibilities, they are equally saturated with ideological investments that reproduce rather than rupture dominant paradigms. The analysis emphasises the tension between the rhetoric of decentralisation and the often-consolidated realities of power embedded in code and protocol. Situating DAOs within a rhizomatic ontology reveals both their insurgent promise and the structural constraints that temper their emancipatory aspirations. This paper calls for a sustained critique of the normative assumptions and developmental trajectories shaping these emergent organisations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law and Critique
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-025-09432-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Auction Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DAO as Rhizome: Reimagining Rules, Governance and Organisations

Alvin Hoi-Chun Hung
1 citations
Law and Critique
Auction Theory and Applications
2.11
article

DAO as Rhizome: Reimagining Rules, Governance and Organisations

Alvin Hoi-Chun Hung
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Blockchain’s disruptive potential finds a compelling expression in decentralised autonomous organisations (DAOs), which deploy smart contracts to automate core functions and displace traditional forms of governance. This paper offers a critical interrogation of the DAO phenomenon, examining capacity of DAOs to reconfigure organisational structures and challenge entrenched paradigms of human cooperation. Drawing on Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s concept of the rhizome, a dynamic and non-hierarchical network that fosters continuous growth and transformation, it explores how DAOs embody rhizomatic principles through token-based membership, decentralised governance, and global interconnectivity. Yet even if DAOs gesture towards radical democratic possibilities, they are equally saturated with ideological investments that reproduce rather than rupture dominant paradigms. The analysis emphasises the tension between the rhetoric of decentralisation and the often-consolidated realities of power embedded in code and protocol. Situating DAOs within a rhizomatic ontology reveals both their insurgent promise and the structural constraints that temper their emancipatory aspirations. This paper calls for a sustained critique of the normative assumptions and developmental trajectories shaping these emergent organisations.

Law and CritiqueVol. 37(1)
City University of Hong Kong (HK)
City University of Hong Kong
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Auction Theory and Applications
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DAO as Rhizome: Reimagining Rules, Governance and Organisations — Alvin Hoi-Chun Hung · Law and Critique (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS