Strength Characteristics of Peat Stabilized with Enzyme-Induced Carbonate Precipitation and Inorganic Binders

Postconstruction problems—such as low foundation strength, postconstruction settlement, and extended settlement durations—must be addressed when building structures on peat foundations. In previous engineering practice, inorganic binders were used primarily to stabilize peat foundations. However, peat stabilized with inorganic binders exhibits relatively low strength and can result in substantial carbon emissions. Peat from the Dali region of the Yunnan Province was investigated in this study. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and calcium carbonate precipitation rate tests were conducted to examine the changes in UCS. The study focused on combining the environmentally friendly enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) technique with various proportions of cement, gypsum, fly ash, and sand. The results were compared with the strength characteristics of peat stabilized using EICP alone or inorganic binders (such as cement, gypsum, and fly ash). The results showed that the combination of EICP with inorganic binders improved the UCS of stabilized peat considerably, with varying degrees of strength enhancement depending on the binder used. The combination of EICP with 10% (142 kg/m3) cement achieved the best results, yielding a UCS 12.5 times higher than that of peat stabilized with 10% (142 kg/m3) cement alone and 2.6 times higher than that of peat stabilized with EICP alone. The addition of sand was found to inhibit the strength development of stabilized peat. The calcium carbonate precipitation rate of peat stabilized using the EICP–inorganic binder combination was considerably higher than that of peat stabilized with EICP alone, indicating that inorganic binders could promote the urease reaction to generate calcium carbonate, thereby enhancing the strength of the stabilized peat. This study confirmed the superiority and feasibility of combining EICP with inorganic binders for peat stabilization, offering a new method for practical engineering applications in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geomechanics
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-11246
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strength Characteristics of Peat Stabilized with Enzyme-Induced Carbonate Precipitation and Inorganic Binders

Ruiling Feng, Pengcheng Wang, Ben Liang, Jin-Peng Xu et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Geomechanics
Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
0.80
article

Strength Characteristics of Peat Stabilized with Enzyme-Induced Carbonate Precipitation and Inorganic Binders

Ruiling Feng, Pengcheng Wang, Ben Liang, Jin-Peng Xu, Li-Jian Wu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Postconstruction problems—such as low foundation strength, postconstruction settlement, and extended settlement durations—must be addressed when building structures on peat foundations. In previous engineering practice, inorganic binders were used primarily to stabilize peat foundations. However, peat stabilized with inorganic binders exhibits relatively low strength and can result in substantial carbon emissions. Peat from the Dali region of the Yunnan Province was investigated in this study. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and calcium carbonate precipitation rate tests were conducted to examine the changes in UCS. The study focused on combining the environmentally friendly enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) technique with various proportions of cement, gypsum, fly ash, and sand. The results were compared with the strength characteristics of peat stabilized using EICP alone or inorganic binders (such as cement, gypsum, and fly ash). The results showed that the combination of EICP with inorganic binders improved the UCS of stabilized peat considerably, with varying degrees of strength enhancement depending on the binder used. The combination of EICP with 10% (142 kg/m3) cement achieved the best results, yielding a UCS 12.5 times higher than that of peat stabilized with 10% (142 kg/m3) cement alone and 2.6 times higher than that of peat stabilized with EICP alone. The addition of sand was found to inhibit the strength development of stabilized peat. The calcium carbonate precipitation rate of peat stabilized using the EICP–inorganic binder combination was considerably higher than that of peat stabilized with EICP alone, indicating that inorganic binders could promote the urease reaction to generate calcium carbonate, thereby enhancing the strength of the stabilized peat. This study confirmed the superiority and feasibility of combining EICP with inorganic binders for peat stabilization, offering a new method for practical engineering applications in the field.

International Journal of GeomechanicsVol. 25(12)
Beijing Jiaotong University (CN), Dayton Metro Library (US), China Academy of Railway Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.