Documenting adaptations across the Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and follow-up through Implementation Science research programs: methods and adaptation examples

Our multi-method, systematic approach allowed us to explore how sites document and analyze adaptations across eight ACCSIS Moonshot programs. Using a systematic approach allowed for comparisons of intervention and strategy adaptations within and across research programs and can inform the science of adaptations, while building a knowledge base of why such adaptations are needed and how they can inform implementation efforts across time. Methods described herein provide a template for similar assessment activities in other large, multi-site research initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Health Services
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1613925
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Documenting adaptations across the Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and follow-up through Implementation Science research programs: methods and adaptation examples

Aaron J. Kruse‐Diehr, Sujha Subramanian, Melinda M. Davis, Renée M. Ferrari et al.
Frontiers in Health Services
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Documenting adaptations across the Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and follow-up through Implementation Science research programs: methods and adaptation examples

Aaron J. Kruse‐Diehr, Sujha Subramanian, Melinda M. Davis, Renée M. Ferrari, Sonja Hoover, Jennifer Coury, Jill M. Oliveri, Borsika Adrienn Rabin, Shiraz I. Mishra, Teri L. Malo, Usha Menon, Helen Lam, Jesse Nodora, Karen Kim, Sarah C. Kobrin, Mark P. Doescher, Prajakta Adsul, Kevin English, Erin S. Kenzie
article en

Abstract

Our multi-method, systematic approach allowed us to explore how sites document and analyze adaptations across eight ACCSIS Moonshot programs. Using a systematic approach allowed for comparisons of intervention and strategy adaptations within and across research programs and can inform the science of adaptations, while building a knowledge base of why such adaptations are needed and how they can inform implementation efforts across time. Methods described herein provide a template for similar assessment activities in other large, multi-site research initiatives.

Frontiers in Health ServicesVol. 5
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Kentucky (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Chicago Department of Public Health (US), University of New Mexico (US), UC San Diego Health System (US), Tampa General Hospital (US), University of California San Diego (US), Institute for Magnetospheric Physics (US), Indian Health Board (US), Trinity Southwest University (US), Human Longevity (United States) (US), National Cancer Institute (US), New Mexico Cancer Center (US), Research Network (United States) (US), University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.