Artificial intelligence in engineering education research: Using machine learning models to predict undergraduate engineering students' persistence to graduation

Abstract Background Attrition of engineering students continues to be a concern in higher education. Despite indications that students who opt to leave engineering programs may go on to make meaningful contributions in other fields more aligned to their interests, it remains essential to support those who choose to stay in engineering with the necessary resources, mentorship, and enabling environments to thrive. Purpose This study explores predictors of persistence to graduation for students in a College of Engineering (CoE), examining pre‐college preparation (SAT scores), academic performance in core courses, demographic factors, and engagement in co‐curricular activities. Methods We analyzed a 10‐year dataset (fall 2007 to fall 2016) from a US R1 university's CoE, comprising 16,292 observations. Machine learning techniques, including dimensionality reduction (forward, backward, and unidirectional stepwise regression), explainable artificial intelligence, and predictive modeling (K‐nearest neighbors, logistic regression, decision trees, artificial neural networks, and gradient boosting), were applied to identify significant predictors of persistence. Results Key predictors of persistence included students' GPAs in their first two years and SAT math. Additional factors, although not consistently ranked highly by all models, include performance in PHYS 211, CHM 110, and MAT 140 (Physics 1, Chemistry 1, and Calculus 1, respectively). Demographics and engaging in co‐curricular activities also contribute to persistence, although not as significantly as academic factors. Conclusion Findings from the machine learning models extend Tinto's theory of persistence, and identify key factors that predict engineering students' persistence to graduation. We recommend that institutions engage in strategic planning and policymaking as part of their collective effort to reduce engineering student attrition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering Education
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.70034
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence in engineering education research: Using machine learning models to predict undergraduate engineering students' persistence to graduation

Stephanie Cutler, Viyon Dansu, Robert Rabb, Jennifer Wu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Engineering Education
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
article

Artificial intelligence in engineering education research: Using machine learning models to predict undergraduate engineering students' persistence to graduation

Stephanie Cutler, Viyon Dansu, Robert Rabb, Jennifer Wu, Ibukun Osunbunmi, Bolaji Bamidele, Yashin Brijmohan, Lexy Arinze, Taiwo Feyijimi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Attrition of engineering students continues to be a concern in higher education. Despite indications that students who opt to leave engineering programs may go on to make meaningful contributions in other fields more aligned to their interests, it remains essential to support those who choose to stay in engineering with the necessary resources, mentorship, and enabling environments to thrive. Purpose This study explores predictors of persistence to graduation for students in a College of Engineering (CoE), examining pre‐college preparation (SAT scores), academic performance in core courses, demographic factors, and engagement in co‐curricular activities. Methods We analyzed a 10‐year dataset (fall 2007 to fall 2016) from a US R1 university's CoE, comprising 16,292 observations. Machine learning techniques, including dimensionality reduction (forward, backward, and unidirectional stepwise regression), explainable artificial intelligence, and predictive modeling (K‐nearest neighbors, logistic regression, decision trees, artificial neural networks, and gradient boosting), were applied to identify significant predictors of persistence. Results Key predictors of persistence included students' GPAs in their first two years and SAT math. Additional factors, although not consistently ranked highly by all models, include performance in PHYS 211, CHM 110, and MAT 140 (Physics 1, Chemistry 1, and Calculus 1, respectively). Demographics and engaging in co‐curricular activities also contribute to persistence, although not as significantly as academic factors. Conclusion Findings from the machine learning models extend Tinto's theory of persistence, and identify key factors that predict engineering students' persistence to graduation. We recommend that institutions engage in strategic planning and policymaking as part of their collective effort to reduce engineering student attrition.

Journal of Engineering EducationVol. 114(4)
Utah State University (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Georgia (US), Florida International University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.