Orbits and Masses for 156 Companions from Combined Astrometry and Radial Velocities, and a Validation of Gaia Non-single-star Solutions

Abstract We combine absolute astrometry from Hipparcos and Gaia with archival radial velocities from the Keck/HIRES and ESO/HARPS spectrographs, as well as relative astrometry (when available), to derive masses and orbits for 156 companions around main-sequence stars, including 111 stellar companions, 12 brown dwarfs, and 33 planets. Although this sample is not compiled for occurrence rate statistics due to systematic biases in nonuniform target selection and varied observing strategies, we nonetheless clearly detect the brown dwarf desert in the distribution of companion masses (as well as in mass ratio), out to separations of ≳10 au. This work also enables a validation of Gaia DR3 non-single-star solutions by predicting Gaia’s measured R.A. and decl. acceleration terms. For stars with Gaia astrometric acceleration solutions, we find qualitative agreement with Gaia DR3 results. Our predicted accelerations agree with the Gaia DR3 values overall, showing a median offset of 1.85 σ , with a tail extending to ≈10 σ . These residuals suggest modestly underestimated uncertainties, broadly consistent with previous results for parallaxes and proper motions. Three of our systems have full Gaia orbital fits; however, their true orbital periods are long, and all three Gaia solutions are spurious. Gaia DR4 will provide individual astrometric measurements and enable more detailed and extensive investigations of accelerating and orbital fits.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/adfa99
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orbits and Masses for 156 Companions from Combined Astrometry and Radial Velocities, and a Validation of Gaia Non-single-star Solutions

Timothy D. Brandt, G. Mirek Brandt, Alexander Venner, Qier An
4 citations
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
4.62
article

Orbits and Masses for 156 Companions from Combined Astrometry and Radial Velocities, and a Validation of Gaia Non-single-star Solutions

Timothy D. Brandt, G. Mirek Brandt, Alexander Venner, Qier An
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract We combine absolute astrometry from Hipparcos and Gaia with archival radial velocities from the Keck/HIRES and ESO/HARPS spectrographs, as well as relative astrometry (when available), to derive masses and orbits for 156 companions around main-sequence stars, including 111 stellar companions, 12 brown dwarfs, and 33 planets. Although this sample is not compiled for occurrence rate statistics due to systematic biases in nonuniform target selection and varied observing strategies, we nonetheless clearly detect the brown dwarf desert in the distribution of companion masses (as well as in mass ratio), out to separations of ≳10 au. This work also enables a validation of Gaia DR3 non-single-star solutions by predicting Gaia’s measured R.A. and decl. acceleration terms. For stars with Gaia astrometric acceleration solutions, we find qualitative agreement with Gaia DR3 results. Our predicted accelerations agree with the Gaia DR3 values overall, showing a median offset of 1.85 σ , with a tail extending to ≈10 σ . These residuals suggest modestly underestimated uncertainties, broadly consistent with previous results for parallaxes and proper motions. Three of our systems have full Gaia orbital fits; however, their true orbital periods are long, and all three Gaia solutions are spurious. Gaia DR4 will provide individual astrometric measurements and enable more detailed and extensive investigations of accelerating and orbital fits.

The Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesVol. 280(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
4.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.