A Comparative Study of Two Different Techniques of Laparoscopic Herniotomy in Pediatric Population

Aim: This study evaluates the operative outcomes of two laparoscopic techniques for congenital inguinal hernia repair-Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Purse-String (LIPS) and Laparoscopic Sac Resection with Peritoneal Closure (LSRPC)-in terms of recurrence and testicular atrophy at 3 and 6 months. Settings and Design: A prospective observational study approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Participants, aged 6 months to 14 years, were randomized into two groups: Group I (LIPS) and Group II (LSRPC). For bilateral hernias, each side was repaired using different techniques through the same ports. Randomization was done using computer-based algorithms, ensuring no significant differences in anthropometric measurements. Methods and Material: Study Duration: February 2023 – October 2024 Inclusion Criteria: Children aged 6 months to 14 years with inguinal hernias Exclusion Criteria: Infants under 6 months, obstructed hernia, previous laparotomy, connective tissue disorders, ascites, ventriculo-peritoneal shunts, failure to obtain consent and recurrent hernias Statistical Analysis: Descriptive analysis was conducted using means, standard deviations, percentages and t-tests with SPSS software version 24.0; p<0.05 considered significant Results: Most surgeries were in children aged 5-10 years, with 64% undergoing LIPS and 52% undergoing LSRPC. At 3 months, recurrence occurred in 4% of the LIPS group and none in the LSRPC group. At 6 months, recurrence rates were 8% for LIPS and none for LSRPC. No cases of testicular atrophy were observed. Mean operative time was shorter for LIPS (20.2 minutes) than LSRPC (25.5 minutes), though this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Both LIPS and LSRPC are safe, effective techniques with minimal recurrence and no testicular atrophy. Future studies should focus on longer follow-ups, larger sample sizes and cost-effectiveness. Key Messages: Both techniques were equally effective and safe, with minimal recurrence and no testicular atrophy for 6 months.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pediatric Advance Research
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46889/jpar.2025.4301
Primary Topic
Hernia repair and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Two Different Techniques of Laparoscopic Herniotomy in Pediatric Population

Saket Davera
Journal of Pediatric Advance Research
Hernia repair and management
article

A Comparative Study of Two Different Techniques of Laparoscopic Herniotomy in Pediatric Population

Saket Davera
article en

Abstract

Aim: This study evaluates the operative outcomes of two laparoscopic techniques for congenital inguinal hernia repair-Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Purse-String (LIPS) and Laparoscopic Sac Resection with Peritoneal Closure (LSRPC)-in terms of recurrence and testicular atrophy at 3 and 6 months. Settings and Design: A prospective observational study approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Participants, aged 6 months to 14 years, were randomized into two groups: Group I (LIPS) and Group II (LSRPC). For bilateral hernias, each side was repaired using different techniques through the same ports. Randomization was done using computer-based algorithms, ensuring no significant differences in anthropometric measurements. Methods and Material: Study Duration: February 2023 – October 2024 Inclusion Criteria: Children aged 6 months to 14 years with inguinal hernias Exclusion Criteria: Infants under 6 months, obstructed hernia, previous laparotomy, connective tissue disorders, ascites, ventriculo-peritoneal shunts, failure to obtain consent and recurrent hernias Statistical Analysis: Descriptive analysis was conducted using means, standard deviations, percentages and t-tests with SPSS software version 24.0; p<0.05 considered significant Results: Most surgeries were in children aged 5-10 years, with 64% undergoing LIPS and 52% undergoing LSRPC. At 3 months, recurrence occurred in 4% of the LIPS group and none in the LSRPC group. At 6 months, recurrence rates were 8% for LIPS and none for LSRPC. No cases of testicular atrophy were observed. Mean operative time was shorter for LIPS (20.2 minutes) than LSRPC (25.5 minutes), though this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Both LIPS and LSRPC are safe, effective techniques with minimal recurrence and no testicular atrophy. Future studies should focus on longer follow-ups, larger sample sizes and cost-effectiveness. Key Messages: Both techniques were equally effective and safe, with minimal recurrence and no testicular atrophy for 6 months.

Journal of Pediatric Advance Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Hernia repair and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.