Handling Ethical Dilemmas in Religious Non-Profit Communication

Ethical dilemmas are a persistent challenge in religious non-profit communication, arising from tensions between transparency and confidentiality, cultural diversity and universal principles, or accountability and limited resources. This article examines common dilemmas and introduces structured decision-making models—the Potter Box, the Markkula Center’s Ethical Decision-Making Model, and the PLUS Model—that guide organizations in navigating conflicts systematically. Complementary approaches such as mediation, open dialogue, ethics committees, and collaborative problem-solving are discussed alongside institutional learning through documentation and reflection. Case studies from health, disaster response, governance, and community development illustrate how faith-based organizations apply ethical principles under pressure. The analysis concludes that cultivating a culture of openness, embedding frameworks, and investing in training enables religious non-profits to handle dilemmas with integrity, aligning communication practices with both moral commitments and operational realities.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-eth-cm-rl-org-05
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
51.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Handling Ethical Dilemmas in Religious Non-Profit Communication

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
3 citations
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
51.80
article

Handling Ethical Dilemmas in Religious Non-Profit Communication

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Ethical dilemmas are a persistent challenge in religious non-profit communication, arising from tensions between transparency and confidentiality, cultural diversity and universal principles, or accountability and limited resources. This article examines common dilemmas and introduces structured decision-making models—the Potter Box, the Markkula Center’s Ethical Decision-Making Model, and the PLUS Model—that guide organizations in navigating conflicts systematically. Complementary approaches such as mediation, open dialogue, ethics committees, and collaborative problem-solving are discussed alongside institutional learning through documentation and reflection. Case studies from health, disaster response, governance, and community development illustrate how faith-based organizations apply ethical principles under pressure. The analysis concludes that cultivating a culture of openness, embedding frameworks, and investing in training enables religious non-profits to handle dilemmas with integrity, aligning communication practices with both moral commitments and operational realities.

Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
51.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.