Patients With Skin Cancer Prefer to Participate in Procedure Cost Discussions: A Cross‐Sectional Survey

For a given skin cancer, a number of treatment options are often available. The decision of which method to use is usually made by the treating physician. Despite significant changes to the healthcare system of the United States over the past 10 years, healthcare costs continue to rise. These costs often affect patients in the form of higher deductibles, copays, and insurance premiums. The goal of this study was to determine patient attitudes regarding discussion of cost of skin cancer removal procedures and repairs. A 12-question survey was administered to 100 patients presenting for treatment of a skin cancer at an academic center. The first six questions addressed the importance the patient placed on treatment cost and related discussions, and the final six questions addressed repair cost. Greater than two-thirds of respondents felt that cost of both treatment (76%) and repair (67%) is somewhat or very important. Most patients reported that the cost of skin cancer treatment (56%) and repair (54%) should be considered by their surgeon. Furthermore, a majority of participants felt that cost differences should be discussed prior to treatment (67%) or repair (67%). Most respondents believed that cost discussion prior to treatment (64%) and repair (67%) would not affect their level of procedural anxiety. In conclusion, patients value cost discussions for treatment and repair of skin cancer. Surgeons should consider discussing these issues with patients in the appropriate clinical setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dermatology Research and Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/drp/1660527
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients With Skin Cancer Prefer to Participate in Procedure Cost Discussions: A Cross‐Sectional Survey

Vinayak K. Nahar, Laura Rezac, W. H. Black, Ritika Bhandari et al.
Dermatology Research and Practice
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
article

Patients With Skin Cancer Prefer to Participate in Procedure Cost Discussions: A Cross‐Sectional Survey

Vinayak K. Nahar, Laura Rezac, W. H. Black, Ritika Bhandari, Ross Pearlman
article en

Abstract

For a given skin cancer, a number of treatment options are often available. The decision of which method to use is usually made by the treating physician. Despite significant changes to the healthcare system of the United States over the past 10 years, healthcare costs continue to rise. These costs often affect patients in the form of higher deductibles, copays, and insurance premiums. The goal of this study was to determine patient attitudes regarding discussion of cost of skin cancer removal procedures and repairs. A 12-question survey was administered to 100 patients presenting for treatment of a skin cancer at an academic center. The first six questions addressed the importance the patient placed on treatment cost and related discussions, and the final six questions addressed repair cost. Greater than two-thirds of respondents felt that cost of both treatment (76%) and repair (67%) is somewhat or very important. Most patients reported that the cost of skin cancer treatment (56%) and repair (54%) should be considered by their surgeon. Furthermore, a majority of participants felt that cost differences should be discussed prior to treatment (67%) or repair (67%). Most respondents believed that cost discussion prior to treatment (64%) and repair (67%) would not affect their level of procedural anxiety. In conclusion, patients value cost discussions for treatment and repair of skin cancer. Surgeons should consider discussing these issues with patients in the appropriate clinical setting.

Dermatology Research and PracticeVol. 2025(1)
University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.