Blood culture positive sepsis in England, 2017–2018: epidemiological assessment of the commissioning for quality and innovation (CQUIN) sepsis indicator

This study provides novel insights into the epidemiology of sepsis screening in emergency departments across England, highlighting variability in blood culture positivity rates and microbial profiles. The findings underscore the importance of enhanced surveillance strategies, optimised screening protocols, tailored antimicrobial stewardship practices, and quality improvement initiatives to optimise sepsis management and outcomes. Systemic approaches are needed to address knowledge gaps and inform evidence-based interventions for sepsis care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11539-5
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood culture positive sepsis in England, 2017–2018: epidemiological assessment of the commissioning for quality and innovation (CQUIN) sepsis indicator

Ranya Mulchandani, André Charlett, Alex Bhattacharya, Susan Hopkins et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Blood culture positive sepsis in England, 2017–2018: epidemiological assessment of the commissioning for quality and innovation (CQUIN) sepsis indicator

Ranya Mulchandani, André Charlett, Alex Bhattacharya, Susan Hopkins, Rosy Reynolds, Russell Hope, Simon Packer, Isabel Oliver, Joshua Howkins, Colin Stewart Brown, Theresa Lamagni, Carla Robinson
article en

Abstract

This study provides novel insights into the epidemiology of sepsis screening in emergency departments across England, highlighting variability in blood culture positivity rates and microbial profiles. The findings underscore the importance of enhanced surveillance strategies, optimised screening protocols, tailored antimicrobial stewardship practices, and quality improvement initiatives to optimise sepsis management and outcomes. Systemic approaches are needed to address knowledge gaps and inform evidence-based interventions for sepsis care.

BMC Infectious DiseasesVol. 25(1)
Environment Agency (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), University of Bristol (GB), UK Health Security Agency (GB)
National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit, National Institute for Health and Care Research, University of Bristol
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Blood culture positive sepsis in England, 2017–2018: epidemiological assessment of the commissioning for quality and innovation (CQUIN) sepsis indicator — Ranya Mulchandani, André Charlett, et al. · BMC Infectious Diseases (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS