AHP-Based Methodological Proposal for Identifying Suitable Sites for the Italian Near-Surface Repository

The selection of suitable sites for the disposal of radioactive waste constitutes a critical component of nuclear waste management. This study presents an original methodological proposal based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), designed to support early-stage site screening for a near-surface repository in Italy. AHP could be used to identify appropriate locations, focusing on 51 areas that have already undergone a preliminary screening phase. These areas, included in the National Map of Suitable Areas (CNAI), were selected as they fulfill all the technical requirements (geological, geomorphological, and hydraulic stability) necessary to ensure the safety performance of the engineering structures to be implemented through multiple artificial barriers, as specified in Technical Guide N. 29. The proposed methodology is applicable in cases where multiple sites listed in the CNAI have been identified as potential candidates for hosting the repository. A panel of 20 multidisciplinary experts, including engineers, environmental scientists, sociologists, and economists, evaluated two environmental, two economic, and two social criteria not included among the criteria outlined in Technical Guide N. 29. Pairwise comparisons were aggregated using the geometric mean, and consistency ratios (CRs) were calculated to ensure the coherence of expert judgements. Results show that social criteria received the highest overall weight (0.53), in particular the “degree of site acceptability”, followed by environmental (0.28) and economic (0.19) criteria. While the method does not replace detailed site investigations (which will nevertheless be carried out once the site has been chosen), it can facilitate the early identification of promising areas and guide future engagement with local communities. The approach is reproducible, adaptable to additional criteria or national requirements, and may be extended to other countries facing similar nuclear waste management challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Engineering
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jne6040039
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AHP-Based Methodological Proposal for Identifying Suitable Sites for the Italian Near-Surface Repository

Anna Carmela Violante, Giambattista Guidi, Francesca Romana Macioce
Journal of Nuclear Engineering
Urban Planning and Valuation
article

AHP-Based Methodological Proposal for Identifying Suitable Sites for the Italian Near-Surface Repository

Anna Carmela Violante, Giambattista Guidi, Francesca Romana Macioce
article en

Abstract

The selection of suitable sites for the disposal of radioactive waste constitutes a critical component of nuclear waste management. This study presents an original methodological proposal based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), designed to support early-stage site screening for a near-surface repository in Italy. AHP could be used to identify appropriate locations, focusing on 51 areas that have already undergone a preliminary screening phase. These areas, included in the National Map of Suitable Areas (CNAI), were selected as they fulfill all the technical requirements (geological, geomorphological, and hydraulic stability) necessary to ensure the safety performance of the engineering structures to be implemented through multiple artificial barriers, as specified in Technical Guide N. 29. The proposed methodology is applicable in cases where multiple sites listed in the CNAI have been identified as potential candidates for hosting the repository. A panel of 20 multidisciplinary experts, including engineers, environmental scientists, sociologists, and economists, evaluated two environmental, two economic, and two social criteria not included among the criteria outlined in Technical Guide N. 29. Pairwise comparisons were aggregated using the geometric mean, and consistency ratios (CRs) were calculated to ensure the coherence of expert judgements. Results show that social criteria received the highest overall weight (0.53), in particular the “degree of site acceptability”, followed by environmental (0.28) and economic (0.19) criteria. While the method does not replace detailed site investigations (which will nevertheless be carried out once the site has been chosen), it can facilitate the early identification of promising areas and guide future engagement with local communities. The approach is reproducible, adaptable to additional criteria or national requirements, and may be extended to other countries facing similar nuclear waste management challenges.

Journal of Nuclear EngineeringVol. 6(4)
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT), Marconi University (IT), National Agency for New Technologies Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Urban Planning and Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.