Supported Decision‐Making Rights in Behaviour Support Policies

ABSTRACT Disability policy emphasises that people with disability have the right to exercise their will and preferences in their lives, and decision‐making support must be provided to realise this right if they request. One context in which people's will and preferences are often restricted is behaviour support. This article examines whether human rights, including rights to supported decision‐making, are reflected in current behaviour support policies—and if not, what can be done to embed these rights. The article integrates the findings from three evidence reviews of policies conducted in Australia about: the right to supported decision‐making in behaviour support; the alignment between positive behaviour support (PBS) and supported decision‐making in policy; and related resources on supported decision‐making. The reviews found that behaviour support policy does not expressly incorporate the concept of ‘rights, will and preferences’ as articulated in article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Principles to inform supported decision‐making in PBS are needed to address this gap. The positive examples of online supported decision‐making resources identified in the review could assist to operationalise these principles. The findings can inform developments towards embedding rights to supported decision‐making in PBS policy and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Social Issues
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.70070
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supported Decision‐Making Rights in Behaviour Support Policies

Rosemary Kayess, Julian Laurens, Alinka Fisher, Karen Raewyn Fisher et al.
1 citations
Australian Journal of Social Issues
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
3.44
article

Supported Decision‐Making Rights in Behaviour Support Policies

Rosemary Kayess, Julian Laurens, Alinka Fisher, Karen Raewyn Fisher, Sally Robinson, Katrina Reschke, Sabrina Forte
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Disability policy emphasises that people with disability have the right to exercise their will and preferences in their lives, and decision‐making support must be provided to realise this right if they request. One context in which people's will and preferences are often restricted is behaviour support. This article examines whether human rights, including rights to supported decision‐making, are reflected in current behaviour support policies—and if not, what can be done to embed these rights. The article integrates the findings from three evidence reviews of policies conducted in Australia about: the right to supported decision‐making in behaviour support; the alignment between positive behaviour support (PBS) and supported decision‐making in policy; and related resources on supported decision‐making. The reviews found that behaviour support policy does not expressly incorporate the concept of ‘rights, will and preferences’ as articulated in article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Principles to inform supported decision‐making in PBS are needed to address this gap. The positive examples of online supported decision‐making resources identified in the review could assist to operationalise these principles. The findings can inform developments towards embedding rights to supported decision‐making in PBS policy and practice.

Australian Journal of Social Issues
The University of Sydney (AU), Australian Research Council (AU), Flinders University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Living with Disability (GB)
Flinders University
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Supported Decision‐Making Rights in Behaviour Support Policies — Rosemary Kayess, Julian Laurens, et al. · Australian Journal of Social Issues (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS